These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8893641)
1. Descriptive terms for mammographic abnormalities: observer variation in application. The Northern Region Breast Screening Radiology Audit Group. Simpson W; Neilson F; Kelly PJ Clin Radiol; 1996 Oct; 51(10):709-13. PubMed ID: 8893641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Christiansen CL; Fletcher SW J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Sep; 94(18):1373-80. PubMed ID: 12237283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: an initial attempt to standardize terminology. D'Orsi CJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):779-80. PubMed ID: 8610548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Liberman L; Menell JH Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):409-30, v. PubMed ID: 12117184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. Ciccone G; Vineis P; Frigerio A; Segnan N Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28A(6-7):1054-8. PubMed ID: 1627374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of spontaneous resolution of breast calcification. Seymour HR; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):3-8. PubMed ID: 10341682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spectrum of abnormal mammographic findings and their predictive value for malignancy in Singaporean women from a population screening trial. Sng KW; Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde C; Tan KP Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Jul; 29(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 11056775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison. Hofvind S; Bennett RL; Brisson J; Lee W; Pelletier E; Flugelman A; Geller B J Med Screen; 2016 Sep; 23(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 26892191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The technique and results of mammography]. Friedrich M Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Breast calcifications. The usefulness of a standardized system for the description and assessment of the mammographic findings to improve the positive predictive value]. Perugini G; Bonzanini B; Valentino C Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 10780213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eliciting a terminology for mammographic calcifications. Alberdi E; Taylor P; Lee R; Fox J; Todd-Pokropek A Clin Radiol; 2002 Nov; 57(11):1007-13. PubMed ID: 12409112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications. Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; Hendriks JH; Mali WP Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):312-4. PubMed ID: 15107321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted mammographic imaging. Boggis CR; Astley SM Breast Cancer Res; 2000; 2(6):392-5. PubMed ID: 11250731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]