289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8893780)
1. Cement viscosity affects the bone-cement interface in total hip arthroplasty.
Stone JJ; Rand JA; Chiu EK; Grabowski JJ; An KN
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):834-7. PubMed ID: 8893780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.
Miller MA; Race A; Gupta S; Higham P; Clarke MT; Mann KA
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 17197317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Initial stability of an implanted cement-canal prosthesis. Results in experimental studies on human cadaver femurs].
Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Sailer FP
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 8212817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of the bioactive bone cement--bone interface: quantitative and histological evaluation.
Nishimura N; Taguchi Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10148343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study.
Majkowski RS; Bannister GC; Miles AW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):293-7. PubMed ID: 8119032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of a thin coating of polymethylmethacrylate on the torsional fatigue strength of the cement-metal interface.
Davies JP; Singer G; Harris WH
J Appl Biomater; 1992; 3(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10147704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reinforcement of bone cement around the femoral prosthesis tip by pre-coated wire coil: a human cadaver bone study.
Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 8922261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conus hip prosthesis.
Wagner H; Wagner M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Ohashi H; Iida S; Minato I; Viceconti M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):899-908. PubMed ID: 20659780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of cement distribution in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Falez F; Favetti F; Casella F; Papalia M; Panegrossi G
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1162-7. PubMed ID: 20381289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
