BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8893780)

  • 21. Evaluation of the effects of implant materials and designs on thermal necrosis of bone in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Li C; Kotha S; Mason J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 14646056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reducing the risk of bone cement implantation syndrome during femoral arthroplasty.
    Rothberg DL; Kubiak EN; Peters CL; Randall RL; Aoki SK
    Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e463-7. PubMed ID: 23590786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cement fixation system for total hip arthroplasty.
    Oh I; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Apr; (164):221-9. PubMed ID: 7067290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Pittman GT; Peters CL; Hines JL; Bachus KN
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 16950044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a preliminary study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 8000291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis.
    Nelissen RG; Garling EH; Valstar ER
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 16124971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing.
    Beckmann J; Goldapp C; Ringleff K; Schaumburger J; Grifka J; Perlick L
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1317-25. PubMed ID: 18802712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of bone cement viscosity and set time on mantle area in total knee arthroplasty.
    Kopec M; Milbrandt JC; Kohut N; Kern B; Allan DG
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Oct; 38(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 20011741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental study on the cement mantle in hip arthroplasty: effect of defects on the property of the materials used.
    Fognani R; Baleani M; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 2000; 85(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 11569365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
    Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an expandable stem total hip replacement system.
    Kummer FJ; Strauss EJ; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2007; 65(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17581101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
    MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cementation of polyethylene liners into well-fixed metal shells at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Mauerhan DR; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Marshall A
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 18534544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vivo weight-bearing study.
    Dai KR; Liu YK; Park JB; Clark CR; Nishiyama K; Zheng ZK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Feb; 25(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 2055912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of early weight-bearing on experimental total hip arthroplasties in dogs.
    Gitelis S; Chen PQ; Andersson GB; Galante JO; Rostoker W; Andriacchi TP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Sep; (169):291-302. PubMed ID: 7105589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.