These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8893780)

  • 41. The influence of initial pressurization and cup introduction time on the depth of cement penetration in an acetabular model.
    Abdulghani S; Wang JS; McCarthy I; Flivik G
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 17611845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cement oscillation increases interlock strength at the cement-bone interface, with commentary.
    Wang Y; Han P; Gu W; Shi Z; Li D; Wang C
    Orthopedics; 2009 May; 32(5):325; discussion 325. PubMed ID: 19472963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pressurized cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Weber BG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):87-95. PubMed ID: 3383506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.
    Weinrauch PC; Bell C; Wilson L; Goss B; Lutton C; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 17400096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.
    Hunt S; Stone C; Seal S
    Can J Surg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21251430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of surface finish and interstitial fluid on the cement-in-cement interface in revision surgery of the hip.
    Rudol G; Wilcox R; Jin Z; Tsiridis E
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 21282757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Roentgenographic and mechanical performance of centrifuged cement in a simulated total hip arthroplasty model.
    Chao EY; Chin HC; Stauffer RN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):91-101. PubMed ID: 1446460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cements.
    Robinson RP; Wright TM; Burstein AH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Mar; 15(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 7348714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro evaluation of bonding of the cement-metal interface of a total hip femoral component using ultrasound.
    Davies JP; Tse MK; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):335-8. PubMed ID: 7602394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Effect of shock waves on the strength of connection between bone and polymethylmethacrylate. An in vitro study of human femur segments].
    Braun W; Claes L; RĂ¼ter A; Paschke D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 1642041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation.
    Askew MJ; Steege JW; Lewis JL; Ranieri JR; Wixson RL
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 6491790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex-P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model.
    Rey RM; Paiement GD; McGann WM; Jasty M; Harrigan TP; Burke DW; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Feb; (215):272-8. PubMed ID: 3802646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The femoral stem/cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Fornasier VL; Cameron HU
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976 May; (116):248-52. PubMed ID: 1277648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
    Li PL; Ingle PJ; Dowell JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):809-11. PubMed ID: 8836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors affecting flexural strength in cement within cement revisions.
    Dang K; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1540-8. PubMed ID: 21414744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Custom-made molds that prevent cement extrusion through bone defects.
    Slater RR; Morrison J; Kelley SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Aug; (317):126-30. PubMed ID: 7671466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vivo versus in vitro polymerization of acrylic bone cement: effect on material properties.
    Bargar WL; Brown SA; Paul HA; Voegli T; Hseih Y; Sharkey N
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 3950811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intramedullary fixation of artificial hip joints with bone cement-precoated implants. II. Density and histological study.
    Park JB; Barb W; Kenner GH; von Recum AF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 7107661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.