114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8894905)
1. Selecting a database for literature searches in nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL?
Brazier H; Begley CM
J Adv Nurs; 1996 Oct; 24(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 8894905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification.
Subirana M; Solá I; Garcia JM; Gich I; Urrútia G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 58(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15649667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the coverage of clinical medicine provided by PASCAL BIOMED and MEDLINE.
Brand-de Heer DL
Health Info Libr J; 2001 Jun; 18(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 11780731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?
Wilkins T; Gillies RA; Davies K
Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond relevance and recall: testing new user-centred measures of database performance.
Stokes P; Foster A; Urquhart C
Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 19712214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selecting CD-ROM databases for nursing students: a comparison of MEDLINE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL).
Okuma E
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1994 Jan; 82(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8136757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full-text and bibliographic database searching in the health sciences: an exploratory study comparing CCML and MEDLINE.
Gallagher KE; Hulbert LA; Sullivan CP
Med Ref Serv Q; 1990; 9(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 10110455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for the nurse researcher.
Burnham J; Shearer B
Med Ref Serv Q; 1993; 12(3):45-57. PubMed ID: 10132288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping the literature of occupational therapy.
Reed KL
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1999 Jul; 87(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 10427431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Getting to know journal bibliographic databases.
Ng KH; Peh WC
Singapore Med J; 2010 Oct; 51(10):757-60; quiz 761. PubMed ID: 21103809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches.
Woods D; Trewheellar K
BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1166. PubMed ID: 9552968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ranking the whole MEDLINE database according to a large training set using text indexing.
Suomela BP; Andrade MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():75. PubMed ID: 15790421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The British Nursing Index and CINAHL: a comparison of journal title coverage and the implications for information professionals.
Briscoe S; Cooper C
Health Info Libr J; 2014 Sep; 31(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 25041256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Handsearching the EMHJ for reports of randomized controlled trials by U.K. Cochrane Centre (Bahrain).
Al Hajeri A; Al Sayyad J; Eisinga A
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 2():S253-7. PubMed ID: 17361697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of online biomedical databases in rheumatology.
Ramos-Remus C; Suarez-Almazor M; Dorgan M; Gomez-Vargas A; Russell AS
J Rheumatol; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1912-21. PubMed ID: 7837159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five large Chinese biomedical bibliographic databases: accessibility and coverage.
Xia J; Wright J; Adams CE
Health Info Libr J; 2008 Mar; 25(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18251914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
