These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8896109)

  • 21. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Zuley M; Baum JK; Marques HS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):813-30, vi. PubMed ID: 17888771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system.
    Muller S
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 31(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 10477095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Standardization for image characteristics in telemammography using genetic and nonlinear algorithms.
    Qian W; Sankar R; Song X; Sun X; Clark R
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Mar; 35(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 15582627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider.
    Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 20082161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What every surgical oncologist should know about digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Cance W
    Semin Surg Oncol; 2001; 20(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 11523102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Digital mammography: current status and image processing].
    Nishide H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 15131505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detectors for digital mammography.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):309-24. PubMed ID: 15270582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The promise of computer aided detection in digital mammography.
    Roehrig J; Castellino RA
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 31(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10477096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Boccignone G; Chianese A; Picariello A
    Comput Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 30(5):267-86. PubMed ID: 10913773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Nawano S
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):67-9. PubMed ID: 7734543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
    Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Solari M; Barke L; Reddy D; Wolfman J; Segal L; DeLeon P; Benjamin S; Willis L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16794152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Zeng D; Muller K; Aylward SR; Park S; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Walsh R; Baker J; Gimenez EI; Freimanis R
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):585-95. PubMed ID: 15866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to transition to digital mammography.
    Zuley M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 17412259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The basics and implementation of digital mammography.
    Zuley ML
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20868892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.