These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8896109)

  • 41. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.
    Fischer U; Hermann KP; Baum F
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16132935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital mammographic screening in Japan.
    Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Digital mammography.
    D'Orsi CJ
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 12033579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Authenticity and integrity of digital mammography images.
    Zhou XQ; Huang HK; Lou SL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):784-91. PubMed ID: 11513029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perspective on digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M
    Semin Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 36(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 11475066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computer-aided detection with full-field digital mammography.
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 May; 21(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16718969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
    Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
    Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Computer-aided detection system for digital mammography: toward the practical use in Japan].
    Kano A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 63(12):1424-8. PubMed ID: 18311005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system.
    Maitz GS; Chang TS; Sumkin JH; Wintz PW; Johns CM; Ganott M; Holbert BL; Hakim CM; Harris KM; Gur D; Herron JM
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 9101359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.
    Shtern F
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 1584908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Current status of digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2006 Nov; 18(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 16988574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Update in digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Artz DS; Freedman MT
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997; 38(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 9063622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast phantom.
    Krug KB; Stützer H; Schröder R; Boecker J; Poggenborg J; Lackner K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):W80-8. PubMed ID: 18716083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Current status of full-field digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Yaffe MJ; Hemminger BM; Hendrick RE; Niklason LT; Maidment AD; Kimme-Smith CM; Feig SA; Sickles EA; Braeuning MP
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Apr; 7(4):266-80. PubMed ID: 10766101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.