These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8896896)

  • 1. Cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening mammography.
    Bastani R; Maxwell AE; Bradford C
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(10):845-8. PubMed ID: 8896896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.
    Jørgensen KJ; Klahn A; Gøtzsche PC
    BMC Med; 2007 May; 5():12. PubMed ID: 17537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
    Vernon SW; Myers RE; Tilley BC; Li S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jan; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 11205487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participation in a breast cancer screening program: influence of past behavior and determinants on future screening participation.
    Lechner L; de Vries H; Offermans N
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 9245669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
    Reeves MJ; Remington PL
    Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of mammography uptake in Korean women aged 40 years and over.
    Ryu E; Ahn O; Baek SS; Jeon MS; Han SE; Park YR; Ham MY
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 18990097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States.
    Cronin KA; Yu B; Krapcho M; Miglioretti DL; Fay MP; Izmirlian G; Ballard-Barbash R; Geller BM; Feuer EJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 16049809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: "Applying recursive partitioning to a prospective study of factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines".
    Radespiel-Tröger M; Hothorn T; Pfahlberg AB; Gefeller O
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 164(4):400-1; author reply 401-2. PubMed ID: 16809428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived ambiguity about screening mammography recommendations: association with future mammography uptake and perceptions.
    Han PK; Kobrin SC; Klein WM; Davis WW; Stefanek M; Taplin SH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Mar; 16(3):458-66. PubMed ID: 17372241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who has screening mammography? Results from the 1994-1995 National Population Health Survey.
    Tudiver F; Fuller-Thomson E
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Aug; 45():1901-7. PubMed ID: 10463090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among male automotive workers.
    McQueen A; Vernon SW; Myers RE; Watts BG; Lee ES; Tilley BC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Mar; 16(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 17372245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Programs of early detection of breast cancer and access of mammography in Spain].
    Luengo S; Azcona B; Lázaro P; Madero R
    Med Clin (Barc); 1997 May; 108(20):761-6. PubMed ID: 9265079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colorectal cancer screening behavior in women attending screening mammography: longitudinal trends and predictors.
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Abrahamse PH; Dong Q; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
    Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(6):249-57. PubMed ID: 16325138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening.
    Legler J; Meissner HI; Coyne C; Breen N; Chollette V; Rimer BK
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11815402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey.
    Duport N; Ancelle-Park R
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Jun; 15(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 16679864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beliefs and mammography screening.
    Cole SR; Bryant CA; McDermott RJ; Sorrell C; Flynn M
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 9415789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys.
    Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B
    Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):487-95. PubMed ID: 10600429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.