These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8897394)

  • 1. Comparison of anaerobic components of the Wingate and Critical Power tests in males and females.
    Bulbulian R; Jeong JW; Murphy M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1996 Oct; 28(10):1336-41. PubMed ID: 8897394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does power indicate capacity? 30-s Wingate anaerobic test vs. maximal accumulated O2 deficit.
    Minahan C; Chia M; Inbar O
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 28(10):836-43. PubMed ID: 17497577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of energy systems during a Wingate power test.
    Smith JC; Hill DW
    Br J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 25(4):196-9. PubMed ID: 1839780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of anaerobic capacity in rowers using Wingate test on cycle and rowing ergometer.
    Klasnja A; Barak O; Popadić-Gaćesa J; Drapsin M; Knezević A; Grujić N
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(9-10):620-3. PubMed ID: 21443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of Omura's ST.36 point (True ST.36) needling on the Wingate anaerobic test results of young soccer players.
    Ozerkan KN; Bayraktar B; Yucesir I; Cakir B; Yilddiz F
    Acupunct Electrother Res; 2009; 34(3-4):205-16. PubMed ID: 20344886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of two different methods of anaerobic capacity assessment in sedentary young men.
    Klasnja A; Drapsin M; Lukac D; Drid P; Obadov S; Grujić N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20361697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wingate Anaerobic Test Percentile Norms in Colombian Healthy Adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; López-Albán CA; La Rotta-Villamizar DR; Romero-García JA; Alonso-Martinez AM; Izquierdo M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jan; 30(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 26691412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests.
    Sands WA; McNeal JR; Ochi MT; Urbanek TL; Jemni M; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 15574087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standard anaerobic exercise tests.
    Vandewalle H; Pérès G; Monod H
    Sports Med; 1987; 4(4):268-89. PubMed ID: 3306867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oxygen uptake during upper body and lower body Wingate anaerobic tests.
    Price M; Beckford C; Dorricott A; Hill C; Kershaw M; Singh M; Thornton I
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2014 Dec; 39(12):1345-51. PubMed ID: 25331765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between anaerobic components of the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and 30-second Wingate test.
    Bertuzzi R; Kiss MA; Damasceno M; Oliveira RS; Lima-Silva AE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Mar; 48(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25627804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3-min all-out effort on cycle ergometer is valid to estimate the anaerobic capacity by measurement of blood lactate and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption.
    Zagatto AM; Redkva PE; de Poli RAB; González JAM; Brandani JZ; Penedo T; Bertuzzi RCM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 Jun; 19(5):645-652. PubMed ID: 30452310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution.
    Hill DW; Smith JC
    Br J Sports Med; 1993 Mar; 27(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8457813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An elliptical trainer may render the Wingate all-out test more anaerobic.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Delextrat A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):643-50. PubMed ID: 23924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wingate Anaerobic Test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and women intercollegiate athletes.
    Zupan MF; Arata AW; Dawson LH; Wile AL; Payn TL; Hannon ME
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Dec; 23(9):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19910814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anaerobic testing using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups.
    LaVoie N; Dallaire J; Brayne S; Barrett D
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1984 Mar; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 6705122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the aerobic contributions to Wingate anaerobic tests performed with two different loads.
    Bediz CS; Gökbel H; Kara M; Uçok K; Cikrikçi E; Ergene N
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1998 Mar; 38(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 9638029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting.
    Mandic S; Quinney HA; Bell GJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 15346227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cycle ergometer type and sex on assessment of 30-second anaerobic capacity and power.
    Leicht AS; Sealey RM; Sinclair WH
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 Sep; 32(9):688-92. PubMed ID: 21618158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.