These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8897944)

  • 21. Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs.
    Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H902-9. PubMed ID: 3177679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preshock phase singularity and the outcome of ventricular defibrillation.
    Hayashi H; Lin SF; Chen PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Jul; 4(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 17599680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
    Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
    Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle: evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy.
    Tang L; Hwang GS; Song J; Chen PS; Lin SF
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):740-9. PubMed ID: 17388914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pacing after shocks stronger than the upper limit of vulnerability: impact on fibrillation induction.
    Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Sreenan CM; White JB; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1337-43. PubMed ID: 10725296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting the potential gradient field in ventricular fibrillation from shocks delivered in paced rhythm.
    Idriss SF; Melnick SB; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1995 Jun; 268(6 Pt 2):H2336-44. PubMed ID: 7611485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.
    Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of transesophageal defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation of long duration.
    Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Eickholt C; Hanrath P; Kelm M; Schauerte P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 26(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 18358938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Successful atrial defibrillation with very-low-energy shocks by means of temporary epicardial wire electrodes.
    Cmolik BL; Oritz J; Ayers GM; Lee JH; Geha AS; Waldo AL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Feb; 111(2):392-7; discussion 397-8. PubMed ID: 8583812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1996 Dec; 94(11):2947-52. PubMed ID: 8941125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
    Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Zhou XH; Knisley SB; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1991 Jun; 68(6):1761-7. PubMed ID: 2036724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is the effectiveness of cardiac ventricular defibrillation dependent upon polarity?
    Schuder JC; Stoeckle H; McDaniel WC; Dbeis M
    Med Instrum; 1987 Oct; 21(5):262-5. PubMed ID: 3683252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A critical period of ventricular fibrillation more susceptible to defibrillation: real-time waveform analysis using a single ECG lead.
    Hsia PW; Frerk S; Allen CA; Wise RM; Cohen NM; Damiano RJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):418-30. PubMed ID: 8848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endocardial Activation Drives Activation Patterns During Long-Duration Ventricular Fibrillation and Defibrillation.
    Panitchob N; Li L; Huang J; Ranjan R; Ideker RE; Dosdall DJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29247031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integration of absolute ventricular fibrillation voltage correlates with successful defibrillation.
    Kuelz KW; Hsia PW; Wise RM; Mahmud R; Damiano RJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Aug; 41(8):782-91. PubMed ID: 7927400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety of atrial defibrillation shocks synchronized to narrow and wide QRS complexes during atrial pacing protocols simulating atrial fibrillation in dogs.
    Keelan ET; Krum D; Hare J; Mughal K; Li H; Akhtar M; Jazayeri MR
    Circulation; 1997 Sep; 96(6):2022-30. PubMed ID: 9323095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.