154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8899365)
1. An evaluation of precaution-based approaches as EMF policy tools in community environments.
Sahl J; Dolan M
Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Sep; 104(9):908-11. PubMed ID: 8899365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses.
Belyaev I; Dean A; Eger H; Hubmann G; Jandrisovits R; Kern M; Kundi M; Moshammer H; Lercher P; Müller K; Oberfeld G; Ohnsorge P; Pelzmann P; Scheingraber C; Thill R
Rev Environ Health; 2016 Sep; 31(3):363-97. PubMed ID: 27454111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies.
Kheifets L; Sahl JD; Shimkhada R; Repacholi MH
Risk Anal; 2005 Aug; 25(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 16268940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambiguous evidence and institutional interpretation: an alternative view of electric and magnetic fields.
Linder SH
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1994; 19(1):165-90. PubMed ID: 8014408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transparent Democratic Foresight Strategies in the California EMF Program.
Neutra RR; Delpizzo V
Public Health Rep; 2002; 117(6):553-63. PubMed ID: 12576535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EMF monitoring-concepts, activities, gaps and options.
Dürrenberger G; Fröhlich J; Röösli M; Mattsson MO
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Sep; 11(9):9460-79. PubMed ID: 25216256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and its application to epidemiologic studies.
Bracken TD; Kheifets LI; Sussman SS
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 8518543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2015 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses.
Belyaev I; Dean A; Eger H; Hubmann G; Jandrisovits R; Johansson O; Kern M; Kundi M; Lercher P; Mosgöller W; Moshammer H; Müller K; Oberfeld G; Ohnsorge P; Pelzmann P; Scheingraber C; Thill R
Rev Environ Health; 2015; 30(4):337-71. PubMed ID: 26613329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation.
Spruijt P; Knol AB; Petersen AC; Lebret E
Environ Health; 2015 Jan; 14():7. PubMed ID: 25604825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Managing environmental risks: the benefits of a place-based approach.
Loring PA; Duffy LK
Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(3):1800. PubMed ID: 21936605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimization of measurement methods for a multi-frequency electromagnetic field from mobile phone base station using broadband EMF meter].
Bieńkowski P; Cała P; Zubrzak B
Med Pr; 2015; 66(5):701-12. PubMed ID: 26647988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public policy and private sector provision of health services.
Rosenthal G; Newbrander W
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1996; 11(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 10162428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Instruments to assess and measure personal and environmental radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures.
Bhatt CR; Redmayne M; Abramson MJ; Benke G
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Mar; 39(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 26684750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing potential health risks from electric powerlines: a decision analysis caught in controversy.
von Winterfeldt D; Eppel T; Adams J; Neutra R; DelPizzo V
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1487-502. PubMed ID: 15660606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concern that "EMF" magnetic fields from power lines cause cancer.
Repacholi M
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 426():454-8. PubMed ID: 22534362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Problems and priorities in epidemiologic research on human health effects related to wiring code and electric and magnetic fields.
Siemiatycki J
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):135-41. PubMed ID: 8206022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms: an epidemiological study based on self-reported data and electronic medical records.
Baliatsas C; Bolte J; Yzermans J; Kelfkens G; Hooiveld M; Lebret E; van Kamp I
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2015 May; 218(3):331-44. PubMed ID: 25704188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science, policy, and the protection of human health: a European perspective.
Martuzzi M
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S151-6. PubMed ID: 16059917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of risks from electromagnetic fields: a psychometric evaluation of a risk-communication approach.
MacGregor DG; Slovic P; Morgan MG
Risk Anal; 1994 Oct; 14(5):815-28. PubMed ID: 7800866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
