These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8900245)

  • 1. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.
    Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Consanguinity on Between-Individual Identity-by-Descent Sharing.
    Severson AL; Carmi S; Rosenberg NA
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):305-316. PubMed ID: 30926583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linkage analysis of alcohol dependence using both affected and discordant sib pairs.
    Shih PY; Wang T; Xing C; Sinha M; Song Y; Elston RC
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36. PubMed ID: 16451646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A joint test of linkage and gene x environment interaction, with affected sib pairs.
    Gauderman WJ; Morrison JL; Siegmund KD; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S563-8. PubMed ID: 10597493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
    Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The linkage information content value of polymorphism genetic markers in model-free linkage analysis.
    Guo X; Olson JM; Elston RC; Niu T
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11901271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci by multiple markers.
    Jung J; Fan R; Jin L
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):881-98. PubMed ID: 15802526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs.
    Dizier MH; Quesneville H; Prum B; Selinger-Leneman H; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):433-42. PubMed ID: 11281281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploiting excess sharing: a more powerful test of linkage for affected sib pairs than the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Wicks J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2005-8. PubMed ID: 10788332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
    Yang Y; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
    McPeek MS; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.