These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8900257)

  • 21. 'Verdicts' are in on the Gallo probe.
    Palca J
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5058):735-8. PubMed ID: 1589751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fate of monkeys a source of pain for 6 years.
    Reinhold R
    N Y Times Web; 1987 May; ():1, 8. PubMed ID: 11646183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Government guinea pigs.
    Rothman DJ
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The case of the altered notebooks: Part IV.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):809. PubMed ID: 2188358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New charges hit Illmensee.
    MacKenzie D
    New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crucial research data in report biologist signed are held fake.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Heat rises over UCSD 'misconduct' charge.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6617):566. PubMed ID: 9024644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
    Weiser B
    Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.