These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8900257)

  • 41. US panel rejects hiding source of allegations of misconduct.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6398):765. PubMed ID: 1436045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Too good to be true.
    Colt GH
    Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1993 May; 341(8854):1204-5. PubMed ID: 8098089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
    Palca J
    Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Research project on ear infections dramatizes challenge of conflicts.
    Cordes C
    Chron High Educ; 1993 Mar; 39(26):A23, A28. PubMed ID: 11656295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Cantekin affair.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3333-7. PubMed ID: 1960835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
    US Public Health Service
    Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. 'Ambition and impatience' blamed for fraud.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):6-7. PubMed ID: 8900256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Neuroscientist accused of misconduct turns on his accusers.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6675):424. PubMed ID: 9548238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Verdict in sight in the "Baltimore case".
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4998):1168-72. PubMed ID: 1900949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.