These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8900794)

  • 21. The Blight of the Type II Error: When No Difference Does Not Mean No Difference.
    Domb BG; Sabetian PW
    Arthroscopy; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1353-1356. PubMed ID: 33581304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayes factor and posterior probability: Complementary statistical evidence to p-value.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Sep; 44():33-35. PubMed ID: 26212520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biostatistics Series Module 2: Overview of Hypothesis Testing.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 27057011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Précis of statistical significance: rationale, validity, and utility.
    Chow SL
    Behav Brain Sci; 1998 Apr; 21(2):169-94; discussion 194-239. PubMed ID: 10097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26.
    Sil A; Betkerur J; Das NK
    Indian Dermatol Online J; 2019; 10(6):745-750. PubMed ID: 32195200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The nuts and bolts of hypothesis testing.
    Pugh SL; Molinaro A
    Neurooncol Pract; 2016 Sep; 3(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 31386071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical Power in Plant Pathology Research.
    Gent DH; Esker PD; Kriss AB
    Phytopathology; 2018 Jan; 108(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28876210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Not significant--what now?].
    Gerss J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Dec; 128(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 17213967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.
    Trafimow D
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2006 Nov; 132(4):431-62. PubMed ID: 18341235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
    Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment.
    Greenland S
    Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):225-8. PubMed ID: 21871481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes.
    Batterham AM; Hopkins WG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2006 Mar; 1(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 19114737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the power of some binomial modifications of the Bonferroni multiple test.
    Teriokhin AT; de Meeûs T; Guégan JF
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2007; 68(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 18038646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The multiple-comparison trap and the Raven's paradox-perils of using null hypothesis testing in environmental assessment.
    Qian SS; Cuffney TF
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):409. PubMed ID: 29916087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing.
    Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comment on replication, p-values and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Stat Med; 1992 May; 11(7):875-9. PubMed ID: 1604067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the P Value Have a Future in Plant Pathology?
    Madden LV; Shah DA; Esker PD
    Phytopathology; 2015 Nov; 105(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 26325004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical conclusion validity and type IV errors in rehabilitation research.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Feb; 73(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 1543405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.