These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8901344)

  • 1. Reverse-interference effect in free recall.
    Thapar A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 8901344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining a processing tradeoff explanation of proactive interference.
    Hirshman E; Burns DJ; Kuo TM
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 8433648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
    Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
    Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bizarre imagery in paired-associate learning: an effective mnemonic aid with mixed context, delayed testing, and self-paced conditions.
    Iaccino JF; Sowa SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 2928063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.
    Burns DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1060-7. PubMed ID: 2148579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit associative responses influence encoding in memory.
    Bryant DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 2381314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
    Bäuml KH; Aslan A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
    Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 8538443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The congruency effect: just what is being learned?
    Soltani M; Kroll NE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1192-6. PubMed ID: 11550747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do distractors interfere with memory for study pairs in associative recognition?
    Perruchet P; Rey A; Hivert E; Pacton S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17128603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does organization improve priming?
    Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.
    Diller DE; Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):414-35. PubMed ID: 11294441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age differences in implicit interference.
    Ikier S; Hasher L
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2006 Sep; 61(5):P278-84. PubMed ID: 16960231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.