These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese. Ng ML; Chu R Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction. Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice and speech after laryngectomy. Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Electroacoustic test of the voice of laryngectomized and rehabilitated patients with tracheo-esophageal prosthesis]. Motta G; Motta G; D'Angelo L; Cesari U Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1988; 8 Suppl 20():131-9. PubMed ID: 3073631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An acoustic study of Cantonese alaryngeal speech in different speaking conditions. Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2973. PubMed ID: 37212513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech. Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech. Ng ML J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity. van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production. Most T; Tobin Y; Mimran RC J Commun Disord; 2000; 33(2):165-80; quiz 180-1. PubMed ID: 10834832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech. Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Gomyo Y; Doyle PC J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech. Ng ML; Gilbert HR; Lerman JW Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 11125259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic markers of prosodic boundaries in Spanish spontaneous alaryngeal speech. Cuenca MH; Barrio MM Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Nov; 24(11):859-69. PubMed ID: 20964504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels. Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]