111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8902046)
1. Instrumental and perceptual evidence for tracheoesophageal speech.
Drummond SS; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):658. PubMed ID: 8902046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
Ng ML; Chu R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Electroacoustic test of the voice of laryngectomized and rehabilitated patients with tracheo-esophageal prosthesis].
Motta G; Motta G; D'Angelo L; Cesari U
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1988; 8 Suppl 20():131-9. PubMed ID: 3073631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An acoustic study of Cantonese alaryngeal speech in different speaking conditions.
Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2973. PubMed ID: 37212513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
Ng ML
J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production.
Most T; Tobin Y; Mimran RC
J Commun Disord; 2000; 33(2):165-80; quiz 180-1. PubMed ID: 10834832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech.
Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech.
Gandour J; Weinberg B
J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.
Ng ML; Gilbert HR; Lerman JW
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 11125259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic markers of prosodic boundaries in Spanish spontaneous alaryngeal speech.
Cuenca MH; Barrio MM
Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Nov; 24(11):859-69. PubMed ID: 20964504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.
D'Alatri L; Bussu F; Scarano E; Paludetti G; Marchese MR
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 22209062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
Kischk BT; Gross M
HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
