These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 890225)

  • 1. Tactual and name matching by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Aug; 68(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 890225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early stages of tactual matching.
    Millar S
    Perception; 1977; 6(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 866090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tactual and phonological similarity on the recall of Braille letters by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1975 May; 66(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 1156741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term serial tactual recall: effects of grouping on tactually probed recall of Braille letters and nonsense shapes by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1978 Feb; 69(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 626802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perception of complex patterns by touch.
    Millar S
    Perception; 1985; 14(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 4088791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size and modality effects in Braille learning: Implications for the blind child from pre-reading sighted children.
    Barlow-Brown F; Barker C; Harris M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Mar; 89(1):165-176. PubMed ID: 29911353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of physical size and complexity on tactual discrimination of blind children.
    Berla EP
    Except Child; 1972 Oct; 39(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 4651216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of "physical" matching task for simultaneously presented pairs of letters.
    Hershenson M; Price KP
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Feb; 97(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 4705236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect tactual discrimination of heights by blind and blindfolded sighted subjects.
    Sunanto J; Nakata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 9638737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of phonological and tactual similarity on serial object recall by blind and sighted children.
    Millar S
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 1149476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dichaptic scanning of Braille letters by skilled blind readers: lateralization effects.
    Semenza C; Zoppello M; Gidiuli O; Borgo F
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1071-4. PubMed ID: 8823873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategic hand use preferences and hemispheric specialization in tactual reading: impact of the demands of perceptual encoding.
    Wilkinson JM; Carr TH
    Brain Lang; 1987 Sep; 32(1):97-123. PubMed ID: 3651810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of orientation on tactual braille recognition: optimal touching positions.
    Heller MA
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jun; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 1620567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading embossed capital letters: an fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals.
    Burton H; McLaren DG; Sinclair RJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Apr; 27(4):325-39. PubMed ID: 16142777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imagery and verbalization as mediators in tactual-visual information processing.
    Ford MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 4704330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning as a function of haptic discriminability among items.
    Newman SE; Hall AD; Foster DJ; Gupta V
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):359-72. PubMed ID: 6496809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing generative braille responding following training in a matching-to-sample format.
    Putnam BC; Tiger JH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Dec; 49(4):751-767. PubMed ID: 27357146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategy choices by young Braille readers.
    Millar S
    Perception; 1984; 13(5):567-79. PubMed ID: 6535982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.