410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8902965)
1. The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation.
Infusa A; An HS; Glover JM; McGrady L; Lim TH; Riley LH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2218-23. PubMed ID: 8902965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cadaveric radiographic analysis on the effect of extreme lateral interbody fusion cage placement with supplementary internal fixation on indirect spine decompression.
Marulanda GA; Nayak A; Murtagh R; Santoni BG; Billys JB; Castellvi AE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 23563336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine.
Chen D; Fay LA; Lok J; Yuan P; Edwards WT; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7709283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique.
Rao PJ; Maharaj MM; Phan K; Lakshan Abeygunasekara M; Mobbs RJ
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 25543011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the impact of mild-to-moderate foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 on clinical outcomes following L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Lee HR; Cho JH; Lee DH; Seok SY; Hwang CJ; Lee CS
Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):820-830. PubMed ID: 38219839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does "Coronal Root Angle" Serve as a Parameter in the Removal of Ventral Factors for Foraminal Stenosis at L5-S1 In Stand-alone Microendoscopic Decompression?
Merter A; Shibayama M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Dec; 45(23):1676-1684. PubMed ID: 32858742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positional effects of transforaminal interbody spacer placement at the L5-S1 intervertebral disc space: a biomechanical study.
Tallarico RA; Lavelle WF; J Bianco A; Taormina JL; Ordway NR
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3018-24. PubMed ID: 25007755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of posterior cervical distraction on foraminal dimensions utilizing a screw-rod system.
Jenis LG; Banco S; Jacquemin JJ; Lin KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):763-6. PubMed ID: 15087799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis.
Vamvanij V; Ferrara LA; Hai Y; Zhao J; Kolata R; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(3):E13-8. PubMed ID: 11224873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
