These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8903254)
1. Screening mammography and risk of breast cancer. Werneke U JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1470; author reply 1470-1. PubMed ID: 8903254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Revolution follows the breast cancer epidemic. Evans N Revolution; 1996; 6(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 9043377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening for breast cancer: the time of decision]. Gordenne W J Belge Radiol; 1998 Apr; 81(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9640877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age. Lisby MD Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography]. Iinuma T Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical review of screening for breast cancer. Del Turco MR Recent Results Cancer Res; 1996; 140():123-30. PubMed ID: 8787055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of life expectancy in cancer screening guidelines. Moving with caution from model-based evidence to evidence-based guidelines. Lantz PM; Ubel PA J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):552-3. PubMed ID: 15987335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women. Finucane TE Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling. Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening mammography in primary care settings: implications for cost, access, and quality: background paper. Wagner J Cancer Invest; 1993; 11(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 8221203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The muddle over screening breast Ca. Thomas P Med World News; 1988 May; 29(9):34-6, 42, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10312486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making. Ernster VL Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The feasibility of breast cancer screening. Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening. Wang H; Kåresen R; Hervik A; Thoresen SO Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Jan; 12(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11227924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary on "Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs". Mettlin C Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):251-5; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mass screening of breast cancer: response and justification]. Bartsch P; Gordenne W Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):214-5. PubMed ID: 9641017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of mammography in women older than 65 years of age. Ann Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 139(10):I34. PubMed ID: 14623641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]