496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8903259)
1. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Herbst MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 16157107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
Schmitz T
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography--A Faustian bargain?
Rouse DJ; Owen J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 181(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 10454678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia--a decision analysis.
Culligan PJ; Myers JA; Goldberg RP; Blackwell L; Gohmann SF; Abell TD
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(1):19-28; discussion 28. PubMed ID: 15647962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury.
Ecker JL; Greenberg JA; Norwitz ER; Nadel AS; Repke JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 1):643-7. PubMed ID: 9166293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery.
Gonen R; Bader D; Ajami M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 11084580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Sénat MV; Boulogne AI; Deneux-Tharaux C; Fuchs F; Legendre G; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Schmitz T; Lejeune-Saada V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():156-61. PubMed ID: 27318182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries.
Conway DL; Langer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 May; 178(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 9609560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?
Gonen R; Spiegel D; Abend M
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):526-9. PubMed ID: 8841211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: a population-based study.
Christoffersson M; Rydhstroem H
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 11803228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models.
Badr DA; Cannie MM; Kadji C; Kang X; Carlin A; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):557.e1-557.e8. PubMed ID: 37827273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines.
Gherman RB; Chauhan S; Ouzounian JG; Lerner H; Gonik B; Goodwin TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):657-72. PubMed ID: 16949396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Maternal risks for newborn macrosomia, incidence of a shoulder dystocia and of damages of the plexus brachialis].
Berle P; Misselwitz B; Scharlau J
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 14528418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-diabetic macrosomia: an obstetric dilemma.
Pundir J; Sinha P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 19358024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery.
Conway DL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Dec; 12(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 12683659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Buttarelli M; Franchi M; Dürig P; Brühwiler H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Aug; 109(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 12860334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shoulder dystocia and the next delivery: outcomes and management.
Mehta SH; Blackwell SC; Chadha R; Sokol RJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Oct; 20(10):729-33. PubMed ID: 17763274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
