These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8903551)

  • 1. Large-sized bladders reduce intravesical pressure and fluid absorption during TURP using the suprapubic trocar.
    Zhang W; Ekengren J; Hahn RG
    Urol Int; 1996; 56(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8903551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of bladder capacity and height of fluid bag on intravesical pressure during transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Ekengren J; Zhang W; Hahn RG
    Eur Urol; 1995; 27(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 7744137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intravesical pressure during irrigating fluid absorption in transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Hahn RG
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2000 Apr; 34(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 10903070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous versus intermittent flow irrigation in transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Ekengren J; Hahn RG
    Urology; 1994 Mar; 43(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 8134987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorption of irrigating fluid and height of fluid bag during transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Hahn RG; Ekengren J
    Br J Urol; 1993 Jul; 72(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 8149186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irrigation fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate: spinal vs. general anaesthesia.
    Gehring H; Nahm W; Baerwald J; Fornara P; Schneeweiss A; Roth-Isigkeit A; Schmucker P
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1999 Apr; 43(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 10225081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and causes of fluid absorption: a comparison of three techniques for resection of the prostate under continuous pressure monitoring.
    Heidler H
    BJU Int; 1999 Apr; 83(6):619-22. PubMed ID: 10233567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in intravesical pressure during irrigating fluid absorption in transurethral prostatic surgery.
    Hahn R; Berlin T; Johansson H; Lewenhaupt A
    Urol Res; 1988; 16(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 2459827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of ethanol as a marker to detect and quantify the absorption of irrigation fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Hjertberg H
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1996; 178():1-64. PubMed ID: 8837259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extravascular absorption of irrigating fluid during TURP. The role of transmural bladder pressure as the driving pressure gradient.
    Hultén JO; Sundström GS
    Br J Urol; 1990 Jan; 65(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 1690069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transurethral vaporisation of the prostate and irrigating fluid absorption.
    Gray RA; Moores AH; Hehir M; Worsley M
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Aug; 58(8):787-91. PubMed ID: 12859473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethanol monitoring of the transurethral resection syndrome.
    Hahn RG; Olsson J
    J Clin Anesth; 1996 Dec; 8(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 8982893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravesical pressure and the TUR syndrome.
    Gray RA; Lynch C; Hehir M; Worsley M
    Anaesthesia; 2001 May; 56(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 11350334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a bladder pressure warning device during transurethral prostatic resection decreases absorption of irrigation fluid.
    Hjertberg H; Pettersson B
    Br J Urol; 1992 Jan; 69(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 1737254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid massive irrigating fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Hahn R; Berlin T; Lewenhaupt A
    Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1986; 530():63-5. PubMed ID: 2425531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No evidence of fluid absorption during continuous low-pressure transurethral resection of the prostate: assessment by measuring expiratory breath ethanol concentrations.
    Aragona F; Panza N; Mangano A; Castellucci E; Capizzi A
    Eur Urol; 1999 Aug; 36(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 10420029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the ethanol breath test and on-table weighing to measure irrigating fluid absorption during transurethral prostatectomy.
    Shipstone DP; Inman RD; Beacock CJ; Coppinger SW
    BJU Int; 2002 Dec; 90(9):872-5. PubMed ID: 12460348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between two hypotonic irrigating solutions used in transurethral resections of the prostate: sorbitol (2%)-mannitol (1%) and 1.5% glycine solutions.
    Dimberg M; Norlén H; Allgén LG; Allgén T; Wallin M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1992; 26(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 1279784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluid delivery systems: high flow, low pressure, the key to safe resection.
    Briggs TP; Parker C; Connolly AA; Miller R
    Eur Urol; 1991; 19(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 2022219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blood ammonia concentrations resulting from absorption of irrigating fluid containing glycine and ethanol during transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Hahn RG
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1991; 25(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 1871555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.