These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8905127)

  • 1. Amphetamine disrupts negative patterning but does not produce configural association deficits on an alternative task.
    Blackburn JR; Hevenor SJ
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Oct; 80(1-2):41-9. PubMed ID: 8905127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of d-amphetamine on performance on two operant timing schedules.
    Chiang TJ; Al-Ruwaitea AS; Mobini S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Jun; 150(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 10907670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminative properties of the psychostimulant dl-cathinone in a two lever operant task. Lack of evidence for dopaminergic mediation.
    Goudie AJ; Atkinson J; West CR
    Neuropharmacology; 1986 Jan; 25(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2869439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of impulsivity with amphetamine in an appetitive fixed consecutive number schedule with cue for optimal performance in rats.
    Rivalan M; Grégoire S; Dellu-Hagedorn F
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jun; 192(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 17265075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine and D-amphetamine on the ability of rats to discriminate the durations and intensities of light stimuli.
    Hampson CL; Body S; den Boon FS; Cheung TH; Bezzina G; Langley RW; Fone KC; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19949322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing food deprivation relative to baseline influences D-amphetamine dose-response gradients.
    Lotfizadeh AD; Zimmermann ZJ; Watkins EE; Edwards TL; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Oct; 125():65-69. PubMed ID: 25179163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced appetitive conditioning following repeated pretreatment with d-amphetamine.
    Harmer CJ; Phillips GD
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Jul; 9(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 10065918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats.
    Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 9833007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats.
    Bardo MT; Bevins RA; Klebaur JE; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1083-7. PubMed ID: 9408217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of amphetamine on Kamin blocking and overshadowing.
    O'Tuathaigh CM; Salum C; Young AM; Pickering AD; Joseph MH; Moran PM
    Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 14(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 12838037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Chappell A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 9408215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medial prefrontal cortex infusion of alpha-flupenthixol attenuates systemic d-amphetamine-induced disruption of conditional discrimination performance in rats.
    Dunn MJ; Killcross S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jun; 192(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 17287939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hippocampal theta wave activity during configural and non-configural tasks in rats.
    Sakimoto Y; Hattori M; Takeda K; Okada K; Sakata S
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 23224700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on the performance of complex operant tasks in rats.
    Mayorga AJ; Popke EJ; Fogle CM; Paule MG
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Apr; 109(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 10699658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced dopamine efflux in the amygdala by a predictive, but not a non-predictive, stimulus: facilitation by prior repeated D-amphetamine.
    Harmer CJ; Phillips GD
    Neuroscience; 1999 Apr; 90(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 10188939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of intra-amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT on intra-accumbens d-amphetamine-associated learning. II. Instrumental conditioning.
    Hitchcott PK; Phillips GD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Dec; 140(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 9877011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitatory and inhibitory actions of morphine on the discriminative stimulus properties of D-amphetamine.
    Gaiardi M; Bartoletti M; Gubellini C
    Pharmacol Res; 1998 Nov; 38(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 9806811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drug discrimination analysis of pseudoephedrine in rats.
    Tongjaroenbuangam W; Meksuriyen D; Govitrapong P; Kotchabhakdi N; Baldwin BA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Feb; 59(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 9477001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attenuation of d-amphetamine-induced disruption of conditional discrimination performance by alpha-flupenthixol.
    Dunn MJ; Futter D; Bonardi C; Killcross S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Jan; 177(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 15448975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
    Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.