These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8906436)

  • 1. FDP and ATC method: a mathematical comparison.
    Diener W; Schlede E
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 15(10):855-8. PubMed ID: 8906436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Methodology of calculation of the relationship concentration (dose) - time - effect of general toxic effect of xenobiotics on organism from the point of view of chemical and biologic kinetics].
    Pavlov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1994; (8):52-5. PubMed ID: 7750769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fixed-dose procedure and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison.
    Stallard N; Whitehead A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 14(12):974-90. PubMed ID: 8962748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of integral parameters in the assessment of toxicity and hazards of xenobiotics].
    Antomonov MIu; Bogorad VS
    Gig Sanit; 1992; (7-8):77-9. PubMed ID: 1468682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of correlation effects of single and repeated action in the assessment of cumulative properties of xenobiotics].
    Bogorad VS
    Gig Sanit; 1992 Jan; (1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1526496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prediction of the toxicity of chemical compounds by using basic rules of biokinetics].
    Pavlov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1997; (5):59-61. PubMed ID: 9378356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dermal and inhalation acute toxic class methods: test procedures and biometric evaluations for the Globally Harmonized Classification System.
    Holzhütter HG; Genschow E; Diener W; Schlede E
    Arch Toxicol; 2003 May; 77(5):243-54. PubMed ID: 12734637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Qualification-metric assessment of xenobiotic cumulation in toxicological studies].
    Shtabskiĭ BM
    Gig Sanit; 1993 Mar; (3):77-9. PubMed ID: 8063145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Calculation of the median effective dose and median effective time using a generalized model based on the Waibull distribution].
    Antomonov MIu; Bogorad VS
    Gig Sanit; 1992; (5-6):61-4. PubMed ID: 1398186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral acute toxic class method: a successful alternative to the oral LD50 test.
    Schlede E; Genschow E; Spielmann H; Stropp G; Kayser D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jun; 42(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15896439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the CFU-GM assay to predict acute drug-induced neutropenia: an international blind trial to validate a prediction model for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of myelosuppressive xenobiotics.
    Pessina A; Albella B; Bayo M; Bueren J; Brantom P; Casati S; Croera C; Gagliardi G; Foti P; Parchment R; Parent-Massin D; Schoeters G; Sibiril Y; Van Den Heuvel R; Gribaldo L
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Oct; 75(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 12883091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relationship of dose-time-effects in describing a complex process that includes several separate stages].
    Pavlov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1997; (1):35-7. PubMed ID: 9081875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The variation in slope of concentration-effect relationships.
    Smit MG; Hendriks AJ; Schobben JH; Karman CC; Schobben HP
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2001 Jan; 48(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 11161676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microplate technique for screening and assessing cytotoxicity of xenobiotics with Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Sauvant MP; Pepin D; Bohatier J; Groliere CA
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1995 Nov; 32(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8575361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A theoretical analysis of paired empirical relationships of the type concentration-time and structure-activity from the viewpoint of biokinetics].
    Pavlov VN
    Gig Sanit; 1997; (2):63-4. PubMed ID: 9190349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Criteria significance of the accumulation count in hygienic analysis of xenobiotics mixtures].
    Fedorenko VI
    Gig Sanit; 1993 Jun; (6):65-7. PubMed ID: 8406095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Toxicological evaluation of inhalation noxae: test methods, assessment of toxic action and hazard potential, threshold limit values].
    Kleinsasser N
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 May; 83 Suppl 1():S36-53. PubMed ID: 15118947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biokinetics and biokinetic models in risk assessment.
    van Vliet PW; de Jongh J
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 15(10):799-809. PubMed ID: 8906428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.
    Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicological diversity: making room for the U-shaped dose-response.
    Calabrese EJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):465-6. PubMed ID: 14580005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.