These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8908856)

  • 1. Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold' and plastic cylinders.
    Carr AB; Brunski JB; Hurley E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):589-98. PubMed ID: 8908856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of noble metal implant cylinders: as-received cylinders and cast interfaces with noble metal alloys.
    Carr AB; Brantley WA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 8850457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabricating a nonrotational angulated abutment for a single-tooth prosthesis.
    Reid PE; Zinner ID; Bhagat D
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 20009602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
    Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
    Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T; Gunne J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Titanium alloy cylinders in implant framework fabrication: a study of the cylinder-alloy interface.
    Carr AB; Brantley WA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 8463969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory fabrication of gold occlusal surfaces for removable and implant-supported prostheses.
    Lloyd PM
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Mar; 12(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 12677605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study on microgap of premade abutments and abutments cast in base metal alloys.
    Lalithamma JJ; Mallan SA; Murukan PA; Zarina R
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 24914909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of cast-to implant components from five manufacturers.
    Ucar Y; Brantley WA; Bhattiprolu SN; Johnston WM; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 19782823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.