These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8908863)

  • 1. A comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated Micro-Vent and pure titanium Swede-Vent implants.
    Evian CI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 8908863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
    McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants--a clinical trial.
    Binahmed A; Stoykewych A; Hussain A; Love B; Pruthi V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):963-8. PubMed ID: 18271378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
    Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter retrospective study of ITI implant-supported posterior partial prosthesis in Jordan.
    Jebreen SE; Khraisat A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 17535332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants.
    Wheeler SL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 8752555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
    Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study.
    Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M; Testori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17929526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
    Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
    Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 12500876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
    Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
    Chiapasco M; Ferrini F; Casentini P; Accardi S; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration.
    Lee EH; Ryu SM; Kim JY; Cho BO; Lee YC; Park YJ; Kim SG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1345-52. PubMed ID: 20356664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.