These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8909388)

  • 1. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Danielsson D; Falk T; Persson K
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1308; author reply 1309. PubMed ID: 8909388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1308-9. PubMed ID: 8909390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
    Hadgu A
    Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    McGee DL; Reynolds GH
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1307-8; author reply 1309. PubMed ID: 8909389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9097):217-8. PubMed ID: 9449898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in urine.
    Rabenau H; Berger A; Doerr HW; Weber B
    Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9057):1024-5. PubMed ID: 9100647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of APTIMA COMBO 2 assay with polymerase chain reaction Roche assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
    Khryanin AA; Reshetnikov OV; Vlaspolder F
    Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Dec; 18(12):871-2. PubMed ID: 18073027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern diagnostics of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Stańczak JJ; Majchrzak MJ; Stańczak GP
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2005; 9(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 16082060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two molecular methods for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Molicotti P; Usai D; Cubeddu M; Sechi LA; Zanetti S
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2013 Jan; 7(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 23324823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hadgu A
    Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1391-9. PubMed ID: 9232760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population-based screening programmes for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Caul EO; Horner PJ; Leece J; Crowley T; Paul L; Davey-Smith G
    Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9058):1070-1. PubMed ID: 9107251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of penile skin swab with intra-urethral swab and first void urine for polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in male patients.
    Pittaras TE; Papaparaskevas J; Houhoula DP; Legakis NJ; Frangouli E; Katsambas A; Tsakris A; Papadogeorgakis H
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Dec; 35(12):999-1001. PubMed ID: 18665017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-tube nested polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Zanetti S; Sechi L; Pinna A; Sanna A; Usai D; Carta F; Fadda G
    New Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9037666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Baxter R
    Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 30(2):406-7. PubMed ID: 10671359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mucus digestion improves the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae on the cobas 4800.
    Miller A; Bromhead C; Jones M; Tustin P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Sep; 39(9):733-4. PubMed ID: 22902672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction, leucocyte esterase and urethral and cervical smears.
    Coble BI; Nordahl-Akesson E; Vinnerberg A; Kihlström E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16777755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending a gynecology outpatient department in India.
    Singh V; Rastogi S; Garg S; Kapur S; Kumar A; Salhan S; Mittal A
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 12040650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J; Gérard HC; Bunke T; Whittum-Hudson JA; Zeidler H; Köhler L; Hudson AP; Kuipers JG
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two methods of detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
    Levi AW; Beckman D; Hui P; Schofield K; Harigopal M; Chhieng DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Aug; 138(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 22904135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis.
    Palmer HM; Gilroy CB; Thomas BJ; Hay PE; Gilchrist C; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Apr; 44(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 2030152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.