These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8909390)

  • 1. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1308-9. PubMed ID: 8909390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Danielsson D; Falk T; Persson K
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1308; author reply 1309. PubMed ID: 8909388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
    Hadgu A
    Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    McGee DL; Reynolds GH
    Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9037):1307-8; author reply 1309. PubMed ID: 8909389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9097):217-8. PubMed ID: 9449898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in urine.
    Rabenau H; Berger A; Doerr HW; Weber B
    Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9057):1024-5. PubMed ID: 9100647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of APTIMA COMBO 2 assay with polymerase chain reaction Roche assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
    Khryanin AA; Reshetnikov OV; Vlaspolder F
    Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Dec; 18(12):871-2. PubMed ID: 18073027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern diagnostics of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Stańczak JJ; Majchrzak MJ; Stańczak GP
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2005; 9(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 16082060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two molecular methods for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Molicotti P; Usai D; Cubeddu M; Sechi LA; Zanetti S
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2013 Jan; 7(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 23324823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of penile skin swab with intra-urethral swab and first void urine for polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in male patients.
    Pittaras TE; Papaparaskevas J; Houhoula DP; Legakis NJ; Frangouli E; Katsambas A; Tsakris A; Papadogeorgakis H
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Dec; 35(12):999-1001. PubMed ID: 18665017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-tube nested polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Zanetti S; Sechi L; Pinna A; Sanna A; Usai D; Carta F; Fadda G
    New Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9037666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Baxter R
    Clin Infect Dis; 2000 Feb; 30(2):406-7. PubMed ID: 10671359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mucus digestion improves the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae on the cobas 4800.
    Miller A; Bromhead C; Jones M; Tustin P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Sep; 39(9):733-4. PubMed ID: 22902672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction, leucocyte esterase and urethral and cervical smears.
    Coble BI; Nordahl-Akesson E; Vinnerberg A; Kihlström E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16777755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing two methods of detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
    Levi AW; Beckman D; Hui P; Schofield K; Harigopal M; Chhieng DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Aug; 138(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 22904135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Skidmore S; Horner P; Mallinson H
    Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Aug; 82(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 16877572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in urine.
    Muldoon S
    Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9057):1024; author reply 1025. PubMed ID: 9100646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First evaluation of six nucleic acid amplification tests widely used in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Russia.
    Shipitsyna E; Zolotoverkhaya E; Agné-Stadling I; Krysanova A; Savicheva A; Sokolovsky E; Domeika M; Unemo M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Mar; 23(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19207643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Peterson EM
    West J Med; 1997 Jul; 167(1):36. PubMed ID: 9265862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the new COBAS TaqMan CT test v2.0 and impact on the proportion of new variant Chlamydia trachomatis by the introduction of diagnostics detecting new variant C trachomatis in Orebro county, Sweden.
    Hadad R; Fredlund H; Unemo M
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 19060034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.