These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8909390)

  • 21. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hadgu A
    Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1391-9. PubMed ID: 9232760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Population-based screening programmes for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Caul EO; Horner PJ; Leece J; Crowley T; Paul L; Davey-Smith G
    Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9058):1070-1. PubMed ID: 9107251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of nested and ELISA based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women with preterm complications.
    Sulaiman S; Chong PP; Mokhtarudin R; Lye MS; Wan Hassan WH
    Trop Biomed; 2014 Mar; 31(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 24862043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction assay in nonbacterial prostatitis.
    Guo H; Lu G; Zhang Q; Xiong X
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Mar; 110(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 9594334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection by use of DNA amplification.
    Ostergaard L
    APMIS Suppl; 1999; 89():5-36. PubMed ID: 10189834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A pilot study for diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections by polymerase chain reaction among symptomatic Indian women.
    Sood S; Mukherjee A; Bala M; Satpathy G; Mahajan N; Sharma A; Kapil A; Sharma VK; Pandey RM; Samantaray JC
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2012; 78(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 22772614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enhanced enzyme immunoassay with negative-gray-zone testing compared to a single nucleic Acid amplification technique for community-based chlamydial screening of men.
    Horner P; Skidmore S; Herring A; Sell J; Paul I; Caul O; Egger M; McCarthy A; Sanford E; Salisbury C; Macleod J; Sterne J; Low N;
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 May; 43(5):2065-9. PubMed ID: 15872223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
    Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Issues in Chlamydia trachomatis testing by nucleic acid amplification test.
    Hadgu A
    J Infect Dis; 2006 May; 193(9):1335-6; author reply 1338-9. PubMed ID: 16586375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Limitations of screening tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic adolescent and young adult women.
    Shrier LA; Dean D; Klein E; Harter K; Rice PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 15041995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [DNA amplification in the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection].
    Ostergaard L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Jun; 119(16):2350-6. PubMed ID: 10414201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine using enzyme immunoassay and DNA amplification.
    Rasmussen SJ; Smith-Vaughan H; Nelson M; Chan SW; Timms P; Capon AG
    Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Dec; 7(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 8145773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Value of repeat testing using Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG for indeterminate PCR results when diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    Parcell BJ; Ratnayake L; Kaminski G; Olver WJ; Yirrell DL
    Int J STD AIDS; 2015 Jan; 26(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 24810211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinic attendees: comparison of strand displacement amplification and the ligase chain reaction.
    McCartney RA; Walker J; Scoular A
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2001; 58(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 11788000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis: objective criteria for recommendations for screening using nonculture techniques.
    Addiss DG; Davis JP; Katcher ML
    Wis Med J; 1987 Sep; 86(9):25-7. PubMed ID: 3318161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-effective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: are DNA amplification assays the answer?
    Webb KH
    Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Sep; 25(8):403-7. PubMed ID: 9773431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis.
    Hui YW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2006 Jun; 12(3):247; author reply 247. PubMed ID: 16760561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Does ligase chain reaction assay of urine in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis offer significant improvement over existing diagnostic tests?"--a critical appraisal of the evidence.
    Grun L; Sheldon J
    Genitourin Med; 1996 Dec; 72(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 9038643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia using DNA amplification.
    Genç M; Domeika M; Mårdh PA
    JAMA; 1994 Jun; 271(22):1741. PubMed ID: 8196109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.