These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8909390)

  • 41. Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.
    Hadgu A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 52(12):1231-7. PubMed ID: 10580787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Chlamydia trachomatis detection and the menstrual cycle.
    Horner PJ; Crowley T; Leece J; Hughes A; Smith GD; Caul EO
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9099):341-2. PubMed ID: 9652622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tampon-collected genital cells in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction.
    Tabrizi S; Chen S; Fairley C; Borg A; Migliorini G; Lees M; Garland S
    J Infect Dis; 1993 Sep; 168(3):796-7. PubMed ID: 8354930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Typing of Chlamydia trachomatis from Japanese infants with pneumonia by restriction fragment length polymorphism.
    Numazaki K; Suzuki K; Isobe K; Nakada H; Niida Y; Chiba S
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1996; 28(2):209. PubMed ID: 8792496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Application of polymerase chain reaction for the identification of generalized Chlamydia infection.
    Kuvandzhiev GK; Dimitrakov JD
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2000; 42(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 10979173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.
    Green TA; Black CM; Johnson RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 9466744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two different worlds we live in.
    Schachter J
    Clin Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 27(5):1181-5. PubMed ID: 9827266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. We must be realistic in evaluating rapid diagnostic tests.
    Schachter J
    Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Apr; 26(4):241-2. PubMed ID: 10225594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
    Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J
    Stat Med; 1998 Jul; 17(13):1527-30. PubMed ID: 9695197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In defense of discrepant analysis.
    Green TA; Black CA; Johnson RE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 11233066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Discrepant analysis is still at large.
    Sternberg M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 39(2):826-7. PubMed ID: 11281122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The predictive power and cost of screening for Chlamydia.
    JAMA; 1988 Dec 23-30; 260(24):3590. PubMed ID: 3143021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quality control in nucleic acid amplification methods: use of elementary probability theory.
    Shapiro DS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):848-51. PubMed ID: 9986874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Which tests are best for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Nordbø SA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Nov; 131(23):2333. PubMed ID: 22139099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Diagnostic efficacy of a real time-PCR assay for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in infertile women in north India.
    Dhawan B; Rawre J; Ghosh A; Malhotra N; Ahmed MM; Sreenivas V; Chaudhry R
    Indian J Med Res; 2014 Aug; 140(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 25297359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Patel AL; Sachdev D; Nagpal P; Chaudhry U; Sonkar SC; Mendiratta SL; Saluja D
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2010 Sep; 9():24. PubMed ID: 20822551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.
    Solomon AW; Peeling RW; Foster A; Mabey DC
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 2004 Oct; 17(4):982-1011, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15489358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of multiplex PCR assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas.
    Stellrecht KA; Woron AM; Mishrik NG; Venezia RA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 42(4):1528-33. PubMed ID: 15070999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relative accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests and culture in detecting Chlamydia in asymptomatic men.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Vermund SH; Hook EW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3927-37. PubMed ID: 11682509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.