These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8909684)

  • 41. Single minded.
    Bothamley C
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Jun 7-13; 14(38):24. PubMed ID: 11974286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The hidden cost of colonoscopy including cost of reprocessing and infection rate: the implications for disposable colonoscopes.
    Larsen S; Kalloo A; Hutfless S
    Gut; 2020 Feb; 69(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 31413166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reusable versus disposable forceps: the dilemma of cost and safety.
    Gordon SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):363-5. PubMed ID: 10699795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nebulizer decontamination.
    Allan J; Cunniffe JG; Edwards C; Kretzer D; Ledgerton A; Mackintosh C; Murray AE
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Jan; 59(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 15571859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review.
    Jacobs P; Polisena J; Hailey D; Lafferty S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 29(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 18462140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Recycling of injection equipment in Pakistan.
    Abdul Mujeeb S; Adil MM; Altaf A; Hutin Y; Luby S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 12602701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Disposable versus reusable instrumentation.
    Maddern GJ; Bessell JR
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):125-6. PubMed ID: 7552126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Non-United States guidelines for endoscope reprocessing.
    Tandon RK; Ahuja V
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):295-318. PubMed ID: 10683216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The reuse of ophthalmic minims: an unacceptable cross-infection risk?
    Yap YC; Smith M; Byles D
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Aug; 24(8):1421-2. PubMed ID: 20508657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Straface S
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reprocessing 'single use' devices--why is there so much debate?
    Stoermer WB
    Todays Surg Nurse; 1999; 21(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 10232287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reuse of single-use medical devices: study shows how to determine cost savings and limits.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1997 Jun; 2(6):93-5. PubMed ID: 10175075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis].
    Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Chaos to comprehension: cleaning, sterilization, and disinfection.
    Young EC; Sanford TA
    Urol Nurs; 2003 Oct; 23(5):329-32, 377; quiz 333. PubMed ID: 14621354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. "Single use only": obfuscation or the necessary attainment of zero risk?
    Whitby RM; Looke DF
    Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(10):519-20. PubMed ID: 9397037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microbiological monitoring of endoscopes: 5-year review.
    Gillespie EE; Kotsanas D; Stuart RL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 1):1069-74. PubMed ID: 18086113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dialyzer reuse in Europe: current status and perspectives.
    Stragier A
    Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Mar; 12(3):44. PubMed ID: 9601362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.