These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8910098)

  • 21. Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens.
    Snedeker KG; Totton SC; Sargeant JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jun; 95(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 20338648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-regression.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):19-42. PubMed ID: 27322495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
    Liebeskind DS; Kidwell CS; Sayre JW; Saver JL
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Publication bias in meta-analyses of the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for schizophrenia.
    Niemeyer H; Musch J; Pietrowsky R
    Schizophr Res; 2012 Jul; 138(2-3):103-12. PubMed ID: 22484024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments.
    Korevaar DA; Hooft L; ter Riet G
    Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 45(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 21737463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The incentive to publish negative studies: how beta-blockers and depression got stuck in the publication cycle.
    Luijendijk HJ; Koolman X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 22342262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
    Rosenberg MS
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
    McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Problems in synthesis (meta-analytic) studies: an example from the communication disorders literature.
    Meline T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Dec; 97(3 Pt 2):1085-8. PubMed ID: 15002850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A review of publication bias in the gastroenterology literature.
    Heavener T; Vassar M
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 37(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29488081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.
    Thornton A; Lee P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 53(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 10729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
    Cappelleri JC; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH; de Ferranti SD; Aubert M; Chalmers TC; Lau J
    JAMA; 1996 Oct 23-30; 276(16):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8861993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.