These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8910755)
21. Validation of predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction score compared with standard severity scores in predicting hospital outcome in septic shock patients. Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Mar; 79(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 23254165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database. Moreno R; Miranda DR; Fidler V; Van Schilfgaarde R Crit Care Med; 1998 Jan; 26(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 9428543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of ICU nosocomial infections on outcome from surgical care. Bjerke HS; Leyerle B; Shabot MM Am Surg; 1991 Dec; 57(12):798-802. PubMed ID: 1746797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Attributable Mortality of Secondary Infections in the Intensive Care Unit After Admission for Sepsis. van Vught LA; Klein Klouwenberg PM; Spitoni C; Scicluna BP; Wiewel MA; Horn J; Schultz MJ; Nürnberg P; Bonten MJ; Cremer OL; van der Poll T; JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(14):1469-79. PubMed ID: 26975785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictive value of the APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA and GCS scoring systems in patients with severe purulent bacterial meningitis. Pietraszek-Grzywaczewska I; Bernas S; Łojko P; Piechota A; Piechota M Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 27240026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China. Xing X; Gao Y; Wang H; Huang C; Qu S; Zhang H; Wang H; Sun K PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients. Schellongowski P; Benesch M; Lang T; Traunmüller F; Zauner C; Laczika K; Locker GJ; Frass M; Staudinger T Intensive Care Med; 2004 Mar; 30(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 14598029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The comparison of the efficacy of scoring systems in organophosphate poisoning. Bilgin TE; Camdeviren H; Yapici D; Doruk N; Altunkan AA; Altunkan Z; Oral U Toxicol Ind Health; 2005 Sep; 21(7-8):141-6. PubMed ID: 16149728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict outcome in coronary care patients. Schuster HP; Schuster FP; Ritschel P; Wilts S; Bodmann KF Intensive Care Med; 1997 Oct; 23(10):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9407241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Underlying illness severity and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia: prospective cohort study in intensive care unit. Guzmán-Herrador B; Díaz Molina C; Allam MF; Fernández-Crehuet Navajas R J Hosp Infect; 2014 Jan; 86(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 24239244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit. Katsaragakis S; Papadimitropoulos K; Antonakis P; Strergiopoulos S; Konstadoulakis MM; Androulakis G Crit Care Med; 2000 Feb; 28(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 10708178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effectiveness of the APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA prognostic scoring systems in patients with haematological malignancies in the intensive care unit. Sawicka W; Owczuk R; Wujtewicz MA; Wujtewicz M Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2014; 46(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 25078769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for patients with nosocomial bloodstream infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Marra AR; Bearman GM; Wenzel RP; Edmond MB BMC Infect Dis; 2006 Aug; 6():132. PubMed ID: 16916466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of APACHE II and SAPS II to predict mortality for hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients. Moon BH; Park SK; Jang DK; Jang KS; Kim JT; Han YM J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 22(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 25172016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system. Desa K; Sustić A; Zupan Z; Krstulović B; Golubović V Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):964-9. PubMed ID: 16342351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Predictive values of different critical scoring systems for survival rate after discharge in critically ill patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation]. Zhang J; Li W; Chen X; Mei Y; Lyu J; Hu D; Zhang G; Gao Y; Huang X Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 May; 30(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 29764551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simplified acute physiology score II for measuring severity of illness in intermediate care units. Auriant I; Vinatier I; Thaler F; Tourneur M; Loirat P Crit Care Med; 1998 Aug; 26(8):1368-71. PubMed ID: 9710096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems. Gupta R; Arora VK Indian J Med Res; 2004 Jun; 119(6):273-82. PubMed ID: 15243165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary data set for national intensive care unit assessment. Metnitz PG; Vesely H; Valentin A; Popow C; Hiesmayr M; Lenz K; Krenn CG; Steltzer H Crit Care Med; 1999 Aug; 27(8):1486-91. PubMed ID: 10470754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. Sakr Y; Krauss C; Amaral AC; Réa-Neto A; Specht M; Reinhart K; Marx G Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 18845649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]