125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8911159)
1. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer.
Hricak H; Yu KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1101-8. PubMed ID: 8911159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Di Legge A; De Blasis I; Moruzzi MC; Bonatti M; Collarino A; Rufini V; Manfredi R
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):741-68. PubMed ID: 24861248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Janus CL; Mendelson DS; Moore S; Gendal ES; Dottino P; Brodman M
Clin Imaging; 1989 Jun; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic and interventional radiology in gynecologic neoplasms.
Thorvinger B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1992; 378 ( Pt 3)():93-108. PubMed ID: 1323200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of cervical pathology.
Rezvani M; Shaaban A
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Imaging of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Soyer P; Michel G; Masselot J
J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 71(12):681-9. PubMed ID: 2290148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessing the local extent of uterine cervical cancer.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Bando Y; Harada M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Feb; 61(2):267-275. PubMed ID: 31154804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic appearance of pyometra on computer tomography mimicking pelvic abscess.
Chan LY; Lo KW; Cheung TH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1144-5. PubMed ID: 16929425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cross-sectional imaging of endometrial carcinoma: MR imaging and CT].
Hamm B; Pöllinger A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Jan; 124(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11873311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography imaging in the 21st century as tools for the evaluation and management of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma.
Wolfson AH
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2006 Jul; 16(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 16814160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of imaging in cancer of the cervix. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Hricak H; Mendelson E; Böhm-Vélez M; Bree R; Finberg H; Fishman EK; Laing F; Sartoris D; Thurmond A; Goldstein S
Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215 Suppl():925-30. PubMed ID: 11037518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
Yamamoto K; Kitao M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma].
Tanaka YO
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Oct; 62 Suppl 10():123-6. PubMed ID: 15535219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinics in diagnostic imaging (133). Retained placenta from an intra-abdominal pregnancy.
Win T; Tang PH; Lim TY
Singapore Med J; 2011 Jan; 52(1):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 21298242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
