317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8911712)
1. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people.
Clark GM
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):766-76. PubMed ID: 8911712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The multi-channel cochlear implant: past, present and future perspectives.
Clark G
Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():2-13. PubMed ID: 19127562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
Clark GM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The multi-channel cochlear implant and the relief of severe-to-profound deafness.
Clark G
Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 May; 13(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 22334029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.
Townshend B; Cotter N; Van Compernolle D; White RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 3624633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
Azadpour M; McKay CM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers.
Miller MI; Sachs MB
Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 14(3):257-79. PubMed ID: 6480513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Physiological basis for a cochlear prosthesis (author's transl)].
Klinke R; Hartmann R
Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 223(1):77-137. PubMed ID: 383060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
Shannon RV; Otto SR
Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Tong YC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 6547734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extracochlear electrical stimulation.
Gundersen T; Ramírez-García E; Randa J
Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6719013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
