These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8912215)

  • 1. Maternal-fetal conflict: court-ordered cesarean section.
    Lindgren K
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1996 Oct; 25(8):653-6. PubMed ID: 8912215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom.
    Glass BJ
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 11(2):507-41. PubMed ID: 12680376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc
    Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caesarean without maternal consent.
    Bewley S
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Dec; No. 84():2. PubMed ID: 11651572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When pregnant women and their physicians disagree on the need for cesarean section: no simple solution.
    Catlin AJ
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 9874946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. After Re S.
    Thomson M
    Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 12159826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent in obstetrics: some special problems.
    Rhoden NK
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 11649917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.