These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8912215)
21. Forensic implications and medical-legal dilemmas of maternal versus fetal rights. Mohaupt SM; Sharma KK J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 9729816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Knowledge, practice, and power: court-ordered cesarean sections. Irwin S; Jordan B Med Anthropol Q; 1987 Sep; 1(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 11659066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting. Sturgess RH Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The pregnant woman and the good Samaritan: can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section? Scott R Oxf J Leg Stud; 2000; 20(3):407-36. PubMed ID: 12452142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts. Oberman M Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend? Michalowski S Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women. Ikemoto LC Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Maternal-fetal conflicts. Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives. King NM J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 1757822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy. Mayo TW Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy. Ouellette A Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life. Tauer CA Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. When pregnant patients refuse interventions. Tauer CA AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument. Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pregnant woman vs. fetus: a dilemma for hospital ethics committees. Swartz M Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 1342849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]