These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8913190)

  • 1. The F-wave in the vastus lateralis M. and the segmental motor conduction times for L2/L4 motoneurons.
    Wochnik-Dyjas D; Głazowski C; Niewiadomska M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 101(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 8913190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of motor conduction times using magnetic stimulation of brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves.
    Garassus P; Charles N; Mauguère F
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 33(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 8436082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of normal motor conduction velocity of spinal cord by using transcranial electric stimulation and F-wave study.
    Chang CW; Lien IN
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2009825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical study of corticospinal and peripheral conductions to proximal lower limb muscles.
    Truffert A; Alisauskiene M; Vaiciene N; Magistris MR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1824-34. PubMed ID: 17587640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmental conduction times in the motor nervous system.
    Wochnik-Dyjas D; Głazowski C; Niewiadomska M
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997; 37(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 9187866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximal and distal motor nerve conduction in obturator and femoral nerves.
    Uludag B; Ertekin C; Turman AB; Demir D; Kiylioglu N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Sep; 81(9):1166-70. PubMed ID: 10987156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evaluation of motor pathways to proximal lower limb muscles: a combined method and reference values.
    Alisauskiene M; Magistris MR; Vaiciene N; Truffert A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):513-24. PubMed ID: 17223381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Normal values and age-related changes in magneto-electric evoked compound muscle potentials].
    Kloten H; Meyer BU; Britton TC; Benecke R
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1992 Mar; 23(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 1587231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves. Comparison of magnetic stimulation with electrical stimulation.
    Ono S; Oishi M; Du CM; Takasu T
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995; 35(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 7498078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peculiarity of soleus motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation of tibial nerve.
    Wochnik-Dyjas D; Głazowski C; Niewiadomska M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 109(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 9751301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muscle compound motor action potentials from esophago-vertebral electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the normal awake man.
    Caccia MR; Valla PL; Osio M; Mangoni A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 10627936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. F wave change by decreased motoneuronal excitability: a sleep study.
    Ichikawa T; Yokota T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1994 Mar; 41(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8137452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor evoked potentials in patients with spinal disorders: upper and lower motor neurone affection.
    Herdmann J; Dvorák J; Bock WJ
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 32(7-8):323-30. PubMed ID: 1526212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and evoked pressure curves (EPC) from the urethral compressive musculature (UCM) by functional magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and patients with neurogenic incontinence.
    Schmid DM; Curt A; Hauri D; Schurch B
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15616965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duration, configuration and amplitude of the motor response evoked by magnetic brain stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Kukowski B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 33(5):295-7. PubMed ID: 8404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central motor conduction times using transcranial stimulation and F wave latencies.
    Robinson LR; Jantra P; MacLean IC
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 3343994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methodology and normal values for the recording of evoked muscle potentials following stimulation over motor roots].
    Ludolph AC; Spille M; Masur H; Elger CE
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1988 Jun; 19(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3135998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The H or F wave latencies in medial gastrocnemius in the electrodiagnostic study of sciatica patients with suspected S1 radiculopathy.
    Bobinac-Georgijevski A; Sokolović-Matejcić B; Graberski M
    Neurol Croat; 1991; 40(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 1883922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Segmental motor conduction time for abductor of the fifth finger muscle: methods and normative values].
    Niewiadomska M; Wochnik-Dyjas D; Głazowski C
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1997; 31(6):1157-66. PubMed ID: 9591302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EMG power spectrum and features of the superimposed M-wave during voluntary eccentric and concentric actions at different activation levels.
    Linnamo V; Strojnik V; Komi PV
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Apr; 86(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 11944102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.