136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8913244)
21. Evaluation of the PAPNET system in a general pathology service.
Baird PJ
Med J Aust; 1997 Sep; 167(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 9315021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of PAPNET-assisted cervical rescreening.
Doornewaard H; Woudt JM; Strubbe P; van de Seijp H; van den Tweel JG
Cytopathology; 1997 Oct; 8(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 9313983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. PAPNET computer-aided rescreening for detection of benign and malignant glandular elements in cervicovaginal smears: a review of 61 cases.
Sturgis CD; Isoe C; McNeal NE; Yu GH; DeFrias DV
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Apr; 18(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 9557269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Rescreening of 8096 previous cases for current low-grade and indeterminate-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion diagnoses--a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 323 laboratories.
Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jun; 120(6):519-22. PubMed ID: 8651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [An interlaboratory study of the use of PapNet in the quality control of cervico-vaginal cytology].
Cosentino A; Ghidoni D; Salemi M; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Zani J; Grasso G; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1999 Apr; 91(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10484869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characteristic findings of cervical Papanicolaou tests from transgender patients on androgen therapy: Challenges in detecting dysplasia.
Adkins BD; Barlow AB; Jack A; Schultenover SJ; Desouki MM; Coogan AC; Weiss VL
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 29488269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening.
Bergeron C; Masseroli M; Ghezi A; Lemarie A; Mango L; Koss LG
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical significance of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears owing to inadequate squamous cellularity defined by the Bethesda 2001 criterion.
Adams AL; Gidley J; Roberson J; Wang W; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 May; 123(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 15981813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Follow up of atypical squamous cell Pap smears in Iraqi women.
Pity IS; Shamdeen MY; Wais SA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(7):3455-60. PubMed ID: 22994777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Association of Abnormal Pap Smear with Occult Cervical Stromal Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.
Khumthong K; Aue-Aungkul A; Kleebkaow P; Chumworathayi B; Temtanakitpaisan A; Nhokaew W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2847-2850. PubMed ID: 31554386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pattern of abnormal Pap smears in developing countries: a report from a large referral hospital in Saudi Arabia using the revised 2001 Bethesda System.
Abdullah LS
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 17684431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
