423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8913973)
1. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Electrosurgical loop procedures in ambulatory gynecology].
Abrahamsson LO; Nellemann G
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5767-71. PubMed ID: 9782753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization.
Saidi MH; Setzler FD; Sadler RK; Farhart SA; Akright BD
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9050476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures for cervical dysplasia: experience in a community hospital.
Krebs HB; Pastore L; Helmkamp BF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):289-93; discussion 293-5. PubMed ID: 8362938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inpatient and outpatient loop electrosurgery excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective analysis.
Leimbacher B; Samartzis N; Imesch P; Dedes KJ; Fink D; Canonica C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1441-5. PubMed ID: 22116315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unexpected tumor progression after conization for carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Omatsu K; Takeshima N; Matoda M; Nomura H; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Tanaka H; Akiyama F; Takizawa K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 21917067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?
Munro A; Leung Y; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Semmens J; Codde J; Williams V; O'Leary P; Steel N; Cohen P
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 25769659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Loop conization of cervix uteri in gynecological practice].
Nellemann G; Abrahamsson LO
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5783-6. PubMed ID: 9782756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].
Kovachev S; Nacheva A; Atanassova V; Piperkova N; Kostov I; Vasilev N
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(5):20-5. PubMed ID: 21268398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
