115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8914312)
1. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.
Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness.
Johnson JH; Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Margolis RH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):983-91. PubMed ID: 8445133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.
Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
Schlauch RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.
Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.
Probst R; Harris FP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):504-10. PubMed ID: 8675843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
Lyzenga J; Horst JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensity discrimination in forward masking.
Zeng FG; Turner CW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):782-7. PubMed ID: 1506532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations of first-order approximations for calculations using intensity jnd's.
Hellman RP; Hellman WS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1341-5. PubMed ID: 3782611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forward- and backward-masked intensity discrimination measured using forced-choice and adjustment procedures.
Turner CW; Horwitz AR; Souza PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2121-6. PubMed ID: 7963025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants.
Lyzenga J; Horst JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.
Demany L; Semal C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1295-301. PubMed ID: 2708671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loudness adaptation and excitation patterns: effects of frequency and level.
Hellman R; Miśkiewicz A; Scharf B
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2176-85. PubMed ID: 9104020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory discrimination in a sound-producing electric fish (Pollimyrus): tone frequency and click-rate difference detection.
Marvit P; Crawford JD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1819-25. PubMed ID: 11051508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dynamic range paradox: a central auditory model of intensity change detection.
Simpson AJ; Reiss JD
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57497. PubMed ID: 23536749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity discrimination as the driving force for loudness. Application to pure tones in quiet.
Hellman WS; Hellman RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 2324392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparative effects of signal sensation level and sound-pressure level on interaural time discrimination.
Cohen MF; Koehnke J; McClave AE; Pallanck PG
J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):908-15. PubMed ID: 4031261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
