These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8914317)

  • 81. Estimation of the voice source from speech pressure signals: evaluation of an inverse filtering technique using physical modelling of voice production.
    Alku P; Story B; Airas M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 16479132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. A flow waveform-matched low-dimensional glottal model based on physical knowledge.
    Drioli C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3184-95. PubMed ID: 15957786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Experimental evaluation of inverse filtering using physical systems with known glottal flow and tract characteristics.
    Chu DT; Li K; Epps J; Smith J; Wolfe J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL358-62. PubMed ID: 23656094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics.
    Gauffin J; Sundberg J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 2779199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. How Stressful Is "Deep Bubbling"?
    Tyrmi J; Laukkanen AM
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):262.e1-262.e6. PubMed ID: 27292094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. High-speed Videolaryngoscopy: Quantitative Parameters of Glottal Area Waveforms and High-speed Kymography in Healthy Individuals.
    Tsutsumi M; Isotani S; Pimenta RA; Dajer ME; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH; Tayama N; Yokonishi H; Imagawa H; Yamauchi A; Takano S; Sakakibara KI; Montagnoli AN
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):282-290. PubMed ID: 27793519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The membranous contact quotient: a new phonatory measure of glottal competence.
    Scherer RC; Alipour F; Finnegan E; Guo CG
    J Voice; 1997 Sep; 11(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9297671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness.
    Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Frequency, intensity, and target matching effects on photoglottographic measures of open quotient and speed quotient.
    Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Detecting inaudible vocal organ changes through glottal inverse filtering.
    Geneid A; Rönkkö M; Voutilainen R; Airaksinen L; Toskala E; Alku P; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 2012 Mar; 26(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 21724368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Subglottal pressure and normalized amplitude quotient variation in classically trained baritone singers.
    Björkner E; Sundberg J; Alku P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):157-65. PubMed ID: 17114128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Open slope quotient: a new glottographic parameter.
    Slavit DH; McCaffrey TV
    J Voice; 1995 Mar; 9(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 7757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Flow separation in a computational oscillating vocal fold model.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1710-9. PubMed ID: 15478438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Quantification of videostrobolaryngoscopic findings--measurements of the normal glottal cycle.
    Woo P
    Laryngoscope; 1996 Mar; 106(3 Pt 2 Suppl 79):1-27. PubMed ID: 8609806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Variability in the relationships among voice quality, harmonic amplitudes, open quotient, and glottal area waveform shape in sustained phonation.
    Kreiman J; Shue YL; Chen G; Iseli M; Gerratt BR; Neubauer J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23039455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.
    Zañartu M; Galindo GE; Erath BD; Peterson SD; Wodicka GR; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3262. PubMed ID: 25480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results.
    Hillman RE; Holmberg EB; Perkell JS; Walsh M; Vaughan C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):373-92. PubMed ID: 2739390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Quantification of the Intraglottal Pressure Induced by Flow Separation Vortices Using Large Eddy Simulation.
    Farbos de Luzan C; Oren L; Gutmark E; Khosla SM
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):822-831. PubMed ID: 32273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Aerodynamic measurements: normative data for children ages 6:0 to 10:11 years.
    Weinrich B; Salz B; Hughes M
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):326-39. PubMed ID: 16102661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Effects of bandwidth on glottal airflow waveforms estimated by inverse filtering.
    Alku P; Vilkman E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):763-7. PubMed ID: 7642814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.