These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8914330)

  • 1. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
    Endler JA; Mappes J
    Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naïve and experienced predators.
    Gamberale-Stille G
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 10924208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive.
    Lindström L; Rowe C; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1463):159-62. PubMed ID: 11209885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics.
    Franks DW; Ruxton GD; Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):256-67. PubMed ID: 18786193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence.
    Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
    Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.
    Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
    Stuart YE; Dappen N; Losin N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48497. PubMed ID: 23119039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars.
    Grant JB
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 17439461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The coevolution of warning signals.
    Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):741-6. PubMed ID: 11934367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.
    Sillén-Tullberg B
    Oecologia; 1985 Oct; 67(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 28311576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.