These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8914345)

  • 1. A comparison of two column agglutination technologies for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique.
    Byrne T; Nolan T; O'Donnell R
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1996 Sep; 53(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 8914345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening.
    Abou-Jabal A; Shubeilat T; Hajjiri F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 15751934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V; Kohnhäuser T; Zimmermann R; Ringwald J; Strasser E; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
    Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Observations on antibody determination and differentiation with papain test erythrocytes using the gel centrifugation technique (ID-Microtyping System)].
    Strobel E; Wüllenweber J
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1995 Feb; 22(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7727960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Red cell antibody screening and identification: a comparison of two column technology methods.
    Bromilow IM; Eggington JA; Owen GA; Duguid JK
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1993 Dec; 50(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 8130694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative study of antibody identification in the gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System), solid phase antiglobulin test (Solidscreen Capture R, Ready ID) and tube test].
    Hitzler W; Johanson C; Schömig-Brekner J; Mathias D
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1992; 30():370-4. PubMed ID: 1284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of gel based technique for Coomb's test.
    Jaiprakash M; Gupta PK; Kumar H
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 49(3):370-2. PubMed ID: 17001887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The indirect antiglobulin test: a routine microplate method for antibody screening.
    Hurstell PJ
    Med Lab Sci; 1988 Jul; 45(3):275-6. PubMed ID: 3210935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The gel centrifugation test: comparison of antibody identification at 37 degrees C with antibody identification at room temperature].
    Hitzler WE; Ulrich M; Däumer C; Beeser H
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():61-3. PubMed ID: 8374292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complement-binding anti-Jka not detectable by DiaMed gels.
    O'Brien P; Hopkins L; McCarthy D; Murphy S
    Vox Sang; 1998; 74(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9481863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [ID and Bio Vue systems--comparison of two systems for the typing of erythrocyte antibodies].
    Eichler H; Klinge U; Kretschmer V
    Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1994; 32():149-52. PubMed ID: 9480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serum protein media are important factors in the manual hexadimethrine bromide (polybrene) test, experience in China.
    Liu F; Hu LH
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Feb; 12(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15814291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
    Kaspi E; Mallié F; Gouvitsos J; Dettori I; Chiaroni J; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Direct and indirect anti-globulin (Coombs) test].
    Kajiwara M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2010 Jun; 68 Suppl 6():792-4. PubMed ID: 20942191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-stage papain-indirect antiglobulin test and LISS direct agglutination are not appropriate for pretransfusion screening for unexpected antibodies.
    Pereira A; Mazzara R; Gelabert A; Castillo R
    Haematologica; 1991; 76(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1820984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The gel centrifugation test--principles of the method].
    Hitzler W
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():370-3. PubMed ID: 1703875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three microtube column agglutination systems for antibody screening: DG Gel, DiaMed-ID and Ortho BioVue.
    Cid J; Nogués N; Montero R; Hurtado M; Briega A; Parra R
    Transfus Med; 2006 Apr; 16(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 16623919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.