217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8914345)
1. A comparison of two column agglutination technologies for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique.
Byrne T; Nolan T; O'Donnell R
Br J Biomed Sci; 1996 Sep; 53(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 8914345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening.
Abou-Jabal A; Shubeilat T; Hajjiri F
East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 15751934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
Weisbach V; Kohnhäuser T; Zimmermann R; Ringwald J; Strasser E; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Observations on antibody determination and differentiation with papain test erythrocytes using the gel centrifugation technique (ID-Microtyping System)].
Strobel E; Wüllenweber J
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1995 Feb; 22(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7727960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Red cell antibody screening and identification: a comparison of two column technology methods.
Bromilow IM; Eggington JA; Owen GA; Duguid JK
Br J Biomed Sci; 1993 Dec; 50(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 8130694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative study of antibody identification in the gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System), solid phase antiglobulin test (Solidscreen Capture R, Ready ID) and tube test].
Hitzler W; Johanson C; Schömig-Brekner J; Mathias D
Beitr Infusionsther; 1992; 30():370-4. PubMed ID: 1284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of gel based technique for Coomb's test.
Jaiprakash M; Gupta PK; Kumar H
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 49(3):370-2. PubMed ID: 17001887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J
Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The indirect antiglobulin test: a routine microplate method for antibody screening.
Hurstell PJ
Med Lab Sci; 1988 Jul; 45(3):275-6. PubMed ID: 3210935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The gel centrifugation test: comparison of antibody identification at 37 degrees C with antibody identification at room temperature].
Hitzler WE; Ulrich M; Däumer C; Beeser H
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():61-3. PubMed ID: 8374292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complement-binding anti-Jka not detectable by DiaMed gels.
O'Brien P; Hopkins L; McCarthy D; Murphy S
Vox Sang; 1998; 74(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9481863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [ID and Bio Vue systems--comparison of two systems for the typing of erythrocyte antibodies].
Eichler H; Klinge U; Kretschmer V
Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1994; 32():149-52. PubMed ID: 9480072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serum protein media are important factors in the manual hexadimethrine bromide (polybrene) test, experience in China.
Liu F; Hu LH
Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Feb; 12(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15814291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
Kaspi E; Mallié F; Gouvitsos J; Dettori I; Chiaroni J; Ferrera V
Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Direct and indirect anti-globulin (Coombs) test].
Kajiwara M
Nihon Rinsho; 2010 Jun; 68 Suppl 6():792-4. PubMed ID: 20942191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-stage papain-indirect antiglobulin test and LISS direct agglutination are not appropriate for pretransfusion screening for unexpected antibodies.
Pereira A; Mazzara R; Gelabert A; Castillo R
Haematologica; 1991; 76(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1820984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The gel centrifugation test--principles of the method].
Hitzler W
Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():370-3. PubMed ID: 1703875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three microtube column agglutination systems for antibody screening: DG Gel, DiaMed-ID and Ortho BioVue.
Cid J; Nogués N; Montero R; Hurtado M; Briega A; Parra R
Transfus Med; 2006 Apr; 16(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 16623919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
