These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8916646)

  • 1. The effect of subgingival calculus on the validity of clinical probing measurements.
    Clerehugh V; Abdeia R; Hull PS
    J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 8916646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival inflammation and subgingival calculus as determinants of disease progression in early-onset periodontitis.
    Albandar JM; Kingman A; Brown LJ; Löe H
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 25(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 9543194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between the presence of tooth-borne subgingival deposits and inflammation found with a dental endoscope.
    Wilson TG; Harrel SK; Nunn ME; Francis B; Webb K
    J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2029-35. PubMed ID: 18980509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing. II. Clinical responses related to residual calculus.
    Sherman PR; Hutchens LH; Jewson LG
    J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 2179516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
    Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
    J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the validity of periodontal probing measurements in smokers and non-smokers.
    Biddle AJ; Palmer RM; Wilson RF; Watts TL
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Aug; 28(8):806-12. PubMed ID: 11442742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential reflectometry versus tactile sense detection of subgingival calculus in dentistry.
    Shakibaie F; Walsh LJ
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):106017. PubMed ID: 23096777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative reproducibility of proximal probing depth using electronic pressure-controlled and hand probing.
    Mullally BH; Linden GJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 8195446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of calculus and irrigator tip design on depth of subgingival irrigation.
    Larner JR; Greenstein G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993; 13(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 8262724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal.
    Rabbani GM; Ash MM; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 7014822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of subgingival calculus with a novel LED-based optical probe.
    Krause F; Braun A; Jepsen S; Frentzen M
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1202-6. PubMed ID: 16018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of direct and indirect clinical attachment level measurements.
    Corraini P; Baelum V; Lopez R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):896-905. PubMed ID: 23869826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
    Rams TE; Slots J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
    Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Povidone-iodine as a periodontal pocket disinfectant.
    Hoang T; Jorgensen MG; Keim RG; Pattison AM; Slots J
    J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 12753370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diabetes and periodontal disease: a case-control study.
    Campus G; Salem A; Uzzau S; Baldoni E; Tonolo G
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 15857077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
    Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.