BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8917145)

  • 1. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
    Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.
    Cnattingius R; Höglund B; Kieler H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15842210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
    Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].
    Lehmann M; Hedelin G; Sorgue C; Göllner JL; Grall C; Chami A; Collin D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Jul; 28(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 10480067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Silverberg D; Menes TS; Levy I; Katz M; Mazor M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1335-40. PubMed ID: 15167839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas.
    Thorp JA; Eckert LO; Ang MS; Johnston DA; Peaceman AM; Parisi VM
    Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 1814306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Giacomelli GJ; Hohmann SF
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Aug; 26(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean delivery for abnormal labor.
    Mancuso MS; Rouse DJ
    Clin Perinatol; 2008 Sep; 35(3):479-90, ix. PubMed ID: 18952016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.