These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8917794)

  • 21. Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.
    Sheliga BM; FitzGibbon EJ; Miles FA
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 17118422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Horizontal fixation disparity measures with nonius lines.
    Jaschinski W; Kloke WB; Jainta S; Buchholz J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):988-99. PubMed ID: 16317376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The contribution of vergence change to the measurement of relative disparity.
    Backus BT; Matza-Brown D
    J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):737-50. PubMed ID: 14765957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.
    Sheliga BM; FitzGibbon EJ; Miles FA
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3723-40. PubMed ID: 16765403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.
    Wismeijer DA; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17717656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dark vergence in relation to fixation disparity at different luminance and blur levels.
    Jaschinski-Kruza W
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1197-204. PubMed ID: 8184563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(11):1689-700. PubMed ID: 3832593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion.
    Regan D; Hamstra SJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2277-91. PubMed ID: 7941421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in children and adults.
    Jaschinski W; König M
    Strabismus; 2006 Jun; 14(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 16760113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Central and peripheral visual interactions in disparity-induced vergence eye movements: I. Spatial interaction.
    Tanimoto N; Takagi M; Bando T; Abe H; Hasegawa S; Usui T; Miki A; Zee DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 45(4):1132-8. PubMed ID: 15037579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An adaptable association between vertical and horizontal vergence.
    Schor CM; McCandless JW
    Vision Res; 1995 Dec; 35(23-24):3519-27. PubMed ID: 8560816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.
    Jaschinski W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199958. PubMed ID: 29980146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of changing size on vergence is mediated by changing disparity.
    Wismeijer DA; Erkelens CJ
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):12.1-10. PubMed ID: 20055545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
    Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
    Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Disparity averaging across spatial scales.
    Rohaly AM; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1315-25. PubMed ID: 8023439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect'.
    Tsai JJ; Victor JD
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(17):2265-76. PubMed ID: 10927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement.
    Busettini C; Miles FA; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1392-410. PubMed ID: 8727386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The absolute disparity anomaly and the mechanism of relative disparities.
    Chopin A; Levi D; Knill D; Bavelier D
    J Vis; 2016 Jun; 16(8):2. PubMed ID: 27248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.