These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8919372)
1. Nasopharyngoscopic evaluation and cephalometric analysis of velopharynx in normal and cleft palate patients. Wu JT; Huang GF; Huang CS; Noordhoff MS Ann Plast Surg; 1996 Feb; 36(2):117-22; discussion 122-3. PubMed ID: 8919372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of velopharyngeal growth patterns between cleft lip and/or palate patients requiring or not requiring pharyngeal flap surgery. Mazaheri M; Athanasiou AE; Long RE Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Nov; 31(6):452-60. PubMed ID: 7833337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate. McComb RW; Marrinan EM; Nuss RC; Labrie RA; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 21783004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and aerodynamic measures of velopharyngeal anatomy and function following Furlow Z-plasty. D'Antonio LL; Eichenberg BJ; Zimmerman GJ; Patel S; Riski JE; Herber SC; Hardesty RA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):539-49; discussion 550-3. PubMed ID: 10987459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Velar ascent and morphological factors affecting velopharyngeal function in patients with cleft palate and noncleft controls: a cephalometric study. Satoh K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 15695038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy With Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study. Wu Y; Wang X; Ma L; Li Z Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 25259778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A fiberscopic analysis of velopharyngeal movement before and after primary palatoplasty in cleft palate infants. Igawa HH; Nishizawa N; Sugihara T; Inuyama Y Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(3):668-74. PubMed ID: 9727429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in clients with cleft palate speech: a systematic review. Neumann S; Romonath R Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):95-106. PubMed ID: 22145632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Velopharyngeal morphology of patients with persistent velopharyngeal incompetence following repushback surgery for cleft palate. Nakamura N; Ogata Y; Kunimitsu K; Suzuki A; Sasaguri M; Ohishi M Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Nov; 40(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 14577815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Nasopharyngoscopic analysis of the velopharyngeal function in normal and cleft lip and palate patients]. Wu JT; Noordhoff MS Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Dec; 19(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 9041759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Velopharyngeal function in cleft patients undergoing maxillary advancement. Haapanen ML; Kalland M; Heliövaara A; Hukki J; Ranta R Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 9097494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of velopharyngeal motion in chinese children after primary palatal repair. Tian W; Li Y; Yin H; Zhao SF; Li S; Wang Y; Shi B J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):578-87. PubMed ID: 20216434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of nasopharyngeal growth between patients with clefts and noncleft controls. Wada T; Satoh K; Tachimura T; Tatsuta U Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Sep; 34(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 9345608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of growth of nasopharyngeal structures in velopharyngeal closure in patients with repaired cleft palate and controls without clefts: a cephalometric study. Satoh K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Shiba R Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 40(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 12180199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of maxillary osteotomy on speech in cleft lip and palate: perceptual outcomes of velopharyngeal function. Pereira VJ; Sell D; Tuomainen J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(6):640-50. PubMed ID: 24165361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Craniofacial structure variations in patients with palatal anomalies and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Nachmani A; Aizenbud D; Nageris B; Emodi O; Kassem F J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 27939037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in maxillofacial morphology and velopharyngeal function with two-stage maxillary distraction-mandibular setback surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate. Susami T; Mori Y; Ohkubo K; Takahashi M; Hirano Y; Saijo H; Takato T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 47(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 29150379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Craniofacial characteristics and velopharyngeal function in cleft lip/palate children with and without adenoidectomy. Pulkkinen J; Ranta R; Heliövaara A; Haapanen ML Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 Feb; 259(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 11954929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]