BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8919881)

  • 1. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
    Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cases in which ancestral maximum likelihood will be confusingly misleading.
    Handelman T; Chor B
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():318-323. PubMed ID: 28263816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics.
    Philippe H; Zhou Y; Brinkmann H; Rodrigue N; Delsuc F
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():50. PubMed ID: 16209710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient inference on known phylogenetic trees using Poisson regression.
    Rosset S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e142-7. PubMed ID: 17237083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction Methods to Infer Nonstationary Patterns of Nucleotide Substitution.
    Matsumoto T; Akashi H; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2015 Jul; 200(3):873-90. PubMed ID: 25948563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Cunningham CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 11919280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites.
    Yang Z; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 May; 13(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8676739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.