These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 7885260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face and mouth inversion effects on visual and audiovisual speech perception. Rosenblum LD; Yakel DA; Green KP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):806-19. PubMed ID: 10811177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual and audiovisual speech perception with color and gray-scale facial images. Jordan TR; McCotter MV; Thomas SM Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1394-404. PubMed ID: 11143451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception. Thomas SM; Jordan TR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):873-88. PubMed ID: 15462626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Rosenblum LD; Saldaña HM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):318-31. PubMed ID: 8934846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When half a face is as good as a whole: effects of simple substantial occlusion on visual and audiovisual speech perception. Jordan TR; Thomas SM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2270-85. PubMed ID: 21842332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1777-86. PubMed ID: 8817903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the effects of inversion on configural processing with an audiovisual temporal-order judgment task. Vatakis A; Spence C Perception; 2008; 37(1):143-60. PubMed ID: 18399253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. Grant KW; Tufts JB; Greenberg S J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1164-76. PubMed ID: 17348537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration of facial and newly learned visual cues in speech perception. Massaro D; Cohen MM; Meyer H; Stribling T; Sterling C; Vanderhyden S Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 21977695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Werker JF; Frost PE; McGurk H Can J Psychol; 1992 Dec; 46(4):551-68. PubMed ID: 1286433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Fowler CA; Dekle DJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):816-28. PubMed ID: 1834793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables. Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandarin speech perception by ear and eye follows a universal principle. Chen TH; Massaro DW Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):820-36. PubMed ID: 15495907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term training, transfer, and retention in learning to lipread. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Gesi AT Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):549-62. PubMed ID: 8332424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]